<rdf:RDF xmlns:doap="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap/#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:t="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#" xmlns:cvs="http://nwalsh.com/rdf/cvs#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/06/karma"><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Article"/><dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text"/><dc:format>text/html</dc:format><dc:isFormatOf rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/06/karma.xml"/><dcterms:created>2003-06-06T12:00:00Z</dcterms:created><dcterms:issued>2010-10-08T13:48:05.109375-04:00</dcterms:issued><dc:identifier>6,32</dc:identifier><dc:title>http://..., is that you?</dc:title><dc:date>2003-06-06T12:00:00Z</dc:date><dc:creator rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/who#norman-walsh"/><dc:rights>Copyright © 2003 Norman Walsh.
           This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
           </dc:rights><cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Work"/><dc:description>
Assigning URIs to people, and perhaps to any physical resource,
has consequences both social and technical.
Socially, I think it's a question of politeness. Am I allowed to make up
URIs that identify you? Technically, well, the problems range from
straightforward technical challenges, like how do identify when two
URIs that are spelled differently point to the same resource and what
do you do about it after you have, to the range of http: identifiers.
</dc:description><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#RDF"/><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TAG"/><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TheWeb"/></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/06/karma.xml"><dc:format>application/docbook+xml</dc:format><dc:hasFormat rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/26/nymug"/><dcterms:created>2003-06-06T12:00:00Z</dcterms:created><dcterms:issued>2010-10-08T13:48:05.109375-04:00</dcterms:issued><dc:identifier>6,32</dc:identifier><dc:title>http://..., is that you?</dc:title><dc:date>2003-06-06T12:00:00Z</dc:date><dc:creator rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/who#norman-walsh"/><dc:rights>Copyright © 2003 Norman Walsh.
           This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
           </dc:rights><cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Work"/><dc:description>
Assigning URIs to people, and perhaps to any physical resource,
has consequences both social and technical.
Socially, I think it's a question of politeness. Am I allowed to make up
URIs that identify you? Technically, well, the problems range from
straightforward technical challenges, like how do identify when two
URIs that are spelled differently point to the same resource and what
do you do about it after you have, to the range of http: identifiers.
</dc:description><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#RDF"/><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TAG"/><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TheWeb"/></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>

