norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2003/08/24/cdatahttp://norman.walsh.name/2003/08/24/cdata/comments.atom2012-02-13T06:31:10.53145ZComment 1 on /2003/08/24/cdatahttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012003-08-25T19:51:28Z2003-08-25T19:51:28ZNick Chalkoda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Sad that a book author can get this kind of thing wrong. I never remember this kind of thing. but that is what google and http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#sec-cdata-sect is for. If an author can't be bothered to look up this kind of thing to "GET IT RIGHT" why should I pay for his book. I am not interested in paying for guesses. I need answers.

Comment 2 on /2003/08/24/cdatahttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022003-09-06T01:58:11Z2003-09-06T01:58:11ZJames Cerrada39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

I can gladly confirm that my copy of Goldfarb's and Prescod's _XML Handbook_ correctly discusses CDATA sections. Unfortunately, another XML book that I own doesn't. Funny that I never picked up that error tho. Thanks for the head's up.

Comment 3 on /2003/08/24/cdatahttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00032003-10-08T08:33:22Z2003-10-08T08:33:22ZPaul Downey

What i'd like from XML 2.0 is a BDATA section so we can embed jpegs directly in XML :-o