norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2003/11/04/stupidiehttp://norman.walsh.name/2003/11/04/stupidie/comments.atom2012-05-22T17:58:34.433044ZComment 1 on /2003/11/04/stupidiehttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012003-11-04T23:01:28Z2003-11-04T23:01:28ZEvan Williamsda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Hi,

I used to have this problem - on two machines: Win2K + IE6; WinXP + IE6.

They now seem to work though, with your recent change.

I was persuing Ms, re: a hotfix for IE ... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=817177

I haven't been able to install it yet though. It pre-reqs IE6 SP1, but the installer doesn't recognise that I have this applied. doohh.

cheers, Evan

ps. it may be useful to leave at least one (specially marked) page with images containing meta-data. that way, hopefully we'll get to the bottom of it.

Comment 2 on /2003/11/04/stupidiehttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022003-11-05T04:34:34Z2003-11-05T04:34:34ZTom Passinda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

I have no problem with these images in IE 6 with all updates on Win 2000 SP4 - except for no vertical spacing between the various images.

But then, the page that originally reported the problem, the one with meta data in the images, does not cause a problem with IE on my machine, either...

Comment 3 on /2003/11/04/stupidiehttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00032003-11-05T04:36:45Z2003-11-05T04:36:45ZTom Passinda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Of course, you can't expect this bit of CSS to work in IE -

a[href]:hover { background: #ffa }

(since IE does not support the attribute syntax). Shouldn't cause trouble, though.