<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>No Takers?</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2003/11/17/challenge</biblioid>
<volumenum>6</volumenum>
<issuenum>113</issuenum>
<pubdate>2003-11-17</pubdate>
<date>$Date: 2005-09-11 10:27:02 -0400 (Sun, 11 Sep 2005) $</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2003</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>I challenged the escaped markup crowd to build a feed. No one did.
Did no one notice, or did no one care? Or maybe no one succeeded?</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#RSS"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TAG"/>
</info>

<epigraph>
<attribution>Santayana</attribution>
<para xml:id="p1"><indexterm>
	<primary>Santayana</primary>
      </indexterm>Why
shouldn't things be largely absurd, futile,
and transitory? They are so, and we are so, and they and we go very
well together.</para>
</epigraph>

<para xml:id="p2">A while back, I offered some suggestions about what to do
instead of escaping markup. Near the end of
<link xlink:href="../../09/18/unescmarkup">that essay</link>, I challenged
the folks that are in favor of escaped markup to build a feed
for two HTML documents.</para>

<para xml:id="p3">The issue came up over dinner the other night and a couple of my
colleagues are encouraging me to bring this up as an architectural issue before
the TAG. That
got me to thinking about it again and I realized that no one took up
my challenge.</para>

<para xml:id="p4">Did no one succeed?</para>

<para xml:id="p5">Naturally, I attempted to construct the documents so that
blindly wrapping their contents in CDATA sections would produce a
broken feed. The point I wanted to make was that doing escaped markup
correctly is more effort than it appears to be at first. Hopefully, it
would follow fairly straightforwardly from there that doing it right would
be roughly the same amount of effort. And it wouldn’t be broken and
dangerous.</para>

<para xml:id="p6">To my mind at least, that would be an improvement.</para>

</essay>

