<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-05-22T18:25:48.233845Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2004-03-20T01:31:39Z</published><updated>2004-03-20T01:31:39Z</updated><author><name>David Smith</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Very nice! It looks great in Mozilla 1.5, of course. It's also very nice
from w3m-el in Emacs. Thanks.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2004-03-20T02:17:21Z</published><updated>2004-03-20T02:17:21Z</updated><author><name>Dave Mason</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Norm - looks good to me... but then I am a firefox user and firefox seems to have CSS down quite well.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 3 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0003"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0003</id><published>2004-03-20T04:33:06Z</published><updated>2004-03-20T04:33:06Z</updated><author><name>Bob Clary</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Mozilla (WinXP/SuSe9): Looks fine. 1 Col style makes the right navbar disappear but the content does not reflow.</p>
<p>Opera (WinXP/SuSe9): Looks ok with the exception that the list items in the right navbar have too much vertical spacing. This is true on other pages as well. Note that Mozilla, Opera and MSIE have different settings for padding/margin for LI element. 1 Col Style makes the right navbar disappear but the content does not reflow.</p>
<p>Konqueror 3.1 (SuSe9): Looks fine except the 1 Col / 2 Col links don't work.</p>
<p>Lynx (WinXP): Looks fine except you might consider the "Skip to Navigation/Skip to Content" invisible links for text based clients. See http://devedge.netscape.com/ for an example.</p>
<p>MSIE 6 (WinXP): Looks fine. 1 Col makes the right navbar disappear and the content *does* reflow.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 4 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0004"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0004</id><published>2004-03-20T10:07:20Z</published><updated>2004-03-20T10:07:20Z</updated><author><name>Rick Thomas</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Fine in Safari/Mac OS X</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 5 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0005"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0005</id><published>2004-03-20T14:07:01Z</published><updated>2004-03-20T14:07:01Z</updated><author><name>Chris Purcell</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>1-col doesn't reflow in either Safari or OmniWeb on Mac OS X 1.2.8 - but all three are out of date now. Works fine in IE on the same OS. 2-col looks good in all three.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 6 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0006"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0006</id><published>2004-03-20T15:20:45Z</published><updated>2004-03-20T15:20:45Z</updated><author><name>Etienne Pollard</name></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>In Moz 1.5.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) there is a strange gap between the main body of content and the right-hand navigation elements. The gap runs from the top to the bottom of the page (i.e. the blue top-bar doesn't run all the way across to the navigation elements), and appears to be almost exactly the same width as the navigation elements.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 7 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0007"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0007</id><published>2004-03-22T13:40:47Z</published><updated>2004-03-22T13:40:47Z</updated><author><name>Remus Pereni</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Konqueror 3.2 (Mdk 9.2) Looks fine</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 8 on /2004/03/19/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/03/19/css#comment0008"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0008</id><published>2004-03-29T12:33:26Z</published><updated>2004-03-29T12:33:26Z</updated><author><name>Martin Kenny</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>The new CSS-based pages are way nicer than the table-based ones, in IE on my Pocket PC.</p>
<p>I've noticed that, on the whole, weblogs are among the easiest sites to read on pixel-constrained screens, as they tend to be CSS-based.</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

