<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2004/05/18/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/18/css"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/18/css/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-05-22T18:43:11.765744Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2004/05/18/css</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/18/css#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2006-03-21T11:27:47Z</published><updated>2006-03-21T11:27:47Z</updated><author><name>Tim</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Hi, got here from an off-topic link in a google search.
</p>
    <p>
Just in case you have a mailer or look back on this someday, I'd like to point out that CSS is NOT a table replacement scheme. There are a lot of folks out there who dislike tables and would like to use CSS to replace them, but it's not anywhere near a rule.
</p>
    <p>
I use CSS with tables just fine. CSS is all about separating the layout from the content. And it makes code cleaner. A site converted from plain HTML to one with a stylesheet uses half or less code, less tag attributes all over the place and no more useless  tags. All fonts, colors, styles and ecetera are all globally controlled from the one CSS file.</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

