<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2004/05/19/infoset-equal</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/19/infoset-equal"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/19/infoset-equal/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T09:08:14.151378Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2004/05/19/infoset-equal</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/19/infoset-equal#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2004-05-26T01:20:19Z</published><updated>2004-05-26T01:20:19Z</updated><author><name>Michael Rys</name></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Check out the SQL-2003 part 14 where an infoset-based sameness for XML datatypes is being defined. However, your example shows why equality is a controversial topic. I would think that for many applications, PIs and comments need to be considered for equality, but not for others...</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

