<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2004/05/28/morexsltxquery</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/28/morexsltxquery"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/28/morexsltxquery/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-05-22T18:44:17.646642Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2004/05/28/morexsltxquery</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/28/morexsltxquery#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2004-05-28T22:14:20Z</published><updated>2004-05-28T22:14:20Z</updated><author><name>Danny Ayers</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>But can you convert an RSS 2.0 pubDate (RFC 822) to a dc:date (W3CDTF) with it?</p>
<p>(An argument Dare used against SW technologies that still has me baffled...)</p>
<p>btw, I'm not convinced the following is such a clean alternative, but you can always do recursion without the X :</p>
<p>http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/MovingAwayFromXslt.html</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

