norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2004/06/25/xml2004http://norman.walsh.name/2004/06/25/xml2004/comments.atom2012-02-13T05:01:09.231647ZComment 1 on /2004/06/25/xml2004http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012004-06-26T10:22:45Z2004-06-26T10:22:45ZJirka Kosekda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Great to hear that you will be on XML 2004. I will be there too, presenting paper about indexing in DocBook.

Comment 2 on /2004/06/25/xml2004http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022004-06-26T16:16:10Z2004-06-26T16:16:10ZEdd Dumbill

Welcome news indeed. It's likely I'll follow suit for the Europe conference.

Comment 3 on /2004/06/25/xml2004http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00032004-06-26T17:24:37Z2004-06-26T17:24:37ZHarold Carr

Speaking of writing conference papers in DocBook - I tried doing that but finally had to convert the papers to LaTex so I could get the IEEE or ACM formats required by the conferences I submitted to. Is there (or will there ever be) a good repository of transforms to these types of standard conference formats?

Comment 4 on /2004/06/25/xml2004http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00042004-06-27T14:30:38Z2004-06-27T14:30:38ZNorman Walshda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

If getting a halfway decent looking layout is the first 90% of the effort required to write a print stylesheet, the second 90% is getting a layout that matches exactly a particular set of specs.

I bet it can be done, but I don't know of anyone who's working on it right now.