Overheard at a Working Group Meeting.

The XSL and XML Query Working Groups met for another four days this week.

Submitted again for your amusement, without attribution:

1. On Progress

We're going to second last call and we still don't know how namespace nodes are represented in the data model?

Don't polish the pig, push it out the door.

If we refuse to make any decisions on the basis that we might reconsider them in the future, I think our progress will be limited.

2. On Namespaces

What we need are anti-namespace nodes.

3. On Personalities

It's one thing to have the schema working group against you, it's another thing to have X against you.

You interrupted yourself…

4. On Parsing

X: “When you run that through the deserializer…”

Y: “You mean the parser?”

5. On Optimism

Any reasonable implementation will…

6. On Sanity

X: “Am I completely out of my head?”

Y: “No, you're not. [It’s] another reification of an abstract model”

X: “Y.A.R.A.M.”

Y: “Woohoo! I told you so.”

There are no comments on this essay.
Add a comment or subscribe to (existing and future) comments on this essay.
Name:
Email*:
 *Please provide your real email address; it will not be displayed as part of the comment.
Homepage:
Comment**:
 **The following markup may be used in the body of the comment: a, abbr, b, br, code, em, i, p, pre, strong, and var. You can also use character entities. Any other markup will be discarded, including all attributes (except href on a). Your tag soup will be sanitized...