norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2004/07/30/rdfxml http://norman.walsh.name/2004/07/30/rdfxml/comments.atom 2005-09-02T09:05:00Z Comment 0001 on /2004/07/30/rdfxml http://norman.walsh.name/2004/07/30/rdfxml#comment0001 2004-07-31T00:08:34Z 2004-07-31T00:08:34Z Ken MacLeod bb9fe68ffa844717c1e8752d42ca589ba2044719 http://bitsko.slc.ut.us/

RSS 1.0 also has a restricted RDF/XML serialization; more due to backward compatibility with RSS 0.9 than for readability, but it was also noted at the time that it improved readability and non-RDF processing.

 Comment 0002 on /2004/07/30/rdfxml http://norman.walsh.name/2004/07/30/rdfxml#comment0002 2004-08-06T13:10:25Z 2004-08-06T13:10:25Z James Tauber 53ed0b894e574839d3ab9231ead9eb84e21caa91 http://jtauber.com/blog/

Some more thoughts at http://jtauber.com/blog/2004/08/06/more_on_xml_and_rdf

 Comment 3 on /2004/07/30/rdfxml http://norman.walsh.name/2004/07/30/rdfxml#comment0003 2004-11-04T13:40:22Z 2004-11-04T13:40:22Z Wilfred Springer 2523dd1feaa5259d90b72ea3a9f9558e6cf2ab9c

I hate to say it, but I have to admit that Norman has a point here. (But let nobody touch my precious RDF >:@) No matter how much I like RDF (and OWL in particular) to add semantics the things I produce, it is definitely a nightmare to write it by hand.

In my attempt to get my head around it, I stumbled into WEESA. Definitely worth reading:

http://server2.tecweb.inf.puc-rio.br/we-sw-2004/www2004-weesa.pdf

 Comment 4 on /2004/07/30/rdfxml http://norman.walsh.name/2004/07/30/rdfxml#comment0004 2005-09-02T09:05:00Z 2005-09-02T09:05:00Z Andy Angielski 2ac232b20318fd720474b6ff85bbb787071d7ea6 http://www.geocities.com/pan_andrew

Hey guys I'm getting a bit off the topic here but I got a little problem :). I've traslated into Polish the W3C spec concering RDF and I would like to get a feedback from someone speaking Polish as to translation accuracy . Click on the Polish version to view it. thx andy