<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="pto" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>Dishwasher Repair</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2004/09/28/dishwasherRepair</biblioid>
<volumenum>7</volumenum>
<issuenum>170</issuenum>
<pubdate>2004-09-28T05:45:48-04:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date: 2005-09-11 10:27:02 -0400 (Sun, 11 Sep 2005) $</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2004</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>The dishwasher broke. It broke because of bad design. And, of course,
because it wasn’t really built to last that long.</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#HomeRepair"/>
</info>

<para xml:id="p1">I hate our disposable society. (I’ll write about how I hate the
ever increasing amount of packaging on our disposable products some
other time.) Relatively large, relatively
sophisticated products (TVs, VCRs, vacuum cleaners, household
appliances, cameras, telephones, etc.) are consigned to the landfill
at the first sign of trouble.
</para>

<para xml:id="p2">And because it’s vastly cheaper to let robots (or sweat-shop labor)
build new products than it is to provide trained technicians capable of
repairing them, they’re designed to be disposable. Most of the durable
metal parts have been replaced by molded plastic because they aren’t
expected to last very long.</para>

<para xml:id="p3">The product that started this rant is our
<productname>Amana SofSound II</productname> dishwasher . A while
back, the handle broke and we had it replaced. Last week it broke
again and yesterday we had it replaced again. I don’t remember what
the washer cost new, but a quick web search for similar sounding models
suggests that it was probably somewhere between $300-$400. Apparently,
the handle assembly constitutes 18-25% of that cost as a
replacement is $74.05:</para>

<gal:image rdf:resource="images/20040927-230949"/>

<para xml:id="p4">And why does this handle break? Because every time you open the
washer, the entire load placed on the mechanism is distributed across
a small plastic bracket with about 0.03125in<superscript>2</superscript> of material
support:</para>

<gal:image rdf:resource="images/20040927-231024"/>

<para xml:id="p5">That’s criminally poor engineering in my book.</para>

<para xml:id="p6">Experience suggests the handle lasts about two years. At $129.95
for the service call and $74.05 for the part (this year, it was less
two years ago, even adjusted for inflation, I think), how many times
does it make sense to replace the handle before just replacing the
whole unit?</para>

<para xml:id="p7">On the one hand, the answer is “indefinitely” because the
alternative is either finding someone who will accept a used, slightly
broken dishwasher as a donation or sending it to the landfill. On the
other hand, effectively paying for a new one every four years is
hardly the most economical plan.</para>

<para xml:id="p8">I just hate throwing these highly engineered (almost
entirely non-biodegradable) things away. Four or five years ago, our
VCR stopped recording. It would play, but it wouldn’t record. It was,
I don’t know, ten years old. If not impossible to get repaired,
certainly prohibitively expensive, so we bought a new one. I kept the
old one in the basement for years because I couldn’t bring myself to
throw it out. I just threw out our old vacuum cleaner last week. There
was something wrong with one of the belts. We had it repaired twice before
giving up (about a year ago).</para>

<para xml:id="p9">There is something fundamentally wrong with this paradigm.</para>

</essay>

