<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2005/01/15/spam</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/01/15/spam"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2005/01/15/spam/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T03:51:45.103455Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2005/01/15/spam</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/01/15/spam#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2005-01-16T21:02:07Z</published><updated>2005-01-16T21:02:07Z</updated><author><name>Diego Sevilla Ruiz</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Nice solution. Although I still have not read DSPAM documentation, I'm curious on how do you tell DSPAM that he's wron in any way (either spam or false positive). By the rules I see on exim configuration, you have to resend the e-mail to ham- or spam- e-mails, right? (where "username" is your user name).

Please, tell me if this is the case.

Best regards,
diego</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2005/01/15/spam</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/01/15/spam#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2005-01-16T21:24:19Z</published><updated>2005-01-16T21:24:19Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Exactly. The dspam_addspam_router configuration
intercepts any message to spam-xxx and routes it to dspam marking it
as spam for user xxx. Since it's all delivered locally, it's fast and
convenient. There are mechanisms for feeding dspam a corpus of spam or ham, but I haven't bothered.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 3 on /2005/01/15/spam</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/01/15/spam#comment0003"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0003</id><published>2005-02-03T00:30:14Z</published><updated>2005-02-03T00:30:14Z</updated><author><name>Timothy White</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>What does the following section ?<br clear="none"/><i>-f '$sender_address' -bm </i><br clear="none"/>
I found I had to remove it (at least from the first router section) else I was getting extra envelope to address (-f@domain.com, -bm@domain.com as well as duplicates for the user)

Tim</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 4 on /2005/01/15/spam</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/01/15/spam#comment0004"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0004</id><published>2005-02-07T12:56:18Z</published><updated>2005-02-07T12:56:18Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>I'm sorry, Timothy, I can't explain that. It was folks on the dspam mailing list, mostly Odhiambo, that got me through the configuration process. I don't really grok all the details.</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

