norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2005/02/12/svnfeedhttp://norman.walsh.name/2005/02/12/svnfeed/comments.atom2012-02-13T05:01:31.921309ZComment 1 on /2005/02/12/svnfeedhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012005-02-13T00:45:58Z2005-02-13T00:45:58ZAnneda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

You should really use either HTTP 410 or HTTP 301 for the old CVS feeds.

Comment 2 on /2005/02/12/svnfeedhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022005-02-13T15:06:16Z2005-02-13T15:06:16ZNorman Walshda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

I considered using 301, and I guess I still might do that, but the semantic doesn't feel right. In some sense, the Subversion feed is definitely "the same" resource as the CVS feed, so the feed has just moved. But in another sense, it's not the same feed at all, so saying it moved doesn't feel right.

Using 410 is a good idea though. I'll let the CVS feeds hang around for another week or so, just in case anyone cares, and then I'll 410 'em. Yeah, that feels better.

Comment 3 on /2005/02/12/svnfeedhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00032005-11-03T12:57:30Z2005-11-03T12:57:30ZStephane Bortzmeyerda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

It is nice to publish the XSLT stylesheet but it xsl:includes a stylesheet that I cannot find (utils.xsl).

Comment 4 on /2005/02/12/svnfeedhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00042005-11-03T18:49:59Z2005-11-03T18:49:59ZNorman Walshda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

The utils.xsl file is right in the same place, http://norman.walsh.name/style/utils.xsl.

Comment 5 on /2005/02/12/svnfeedhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00052007-10-14T18:07:03Z2007-10-14T18:07:03ZSamda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

With my service you can do this for any public SVN feed: SVNFeed