<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2005/04/24/lillet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/04/24/lillet"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2005/04/24/lillet/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T04:22:24.251854Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2005/04/24/lillet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2005/04/24/lillet#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2005-04-25T16:31:06Z</published><updated>2005-04-25T16:31:06Z</updated><author><name>John L. Clark</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>I noticed the namespace discussion in the minutes of the meeting, but I wasn't clear (from those minutes) that the decision had been finalized.  The minutes mention that you "proposed" using that namespace.  They also mention the not-yet-finalized OASIS naming rules; I didn't think it was clear whether the committee wanted to wait for those rules to be finalized.  This is, then, the final namespace?</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

