<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="lillet" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>On Spam</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2005/10/12/onSpam</biblioid>
<volumenum>8</volumenum>
<issuenum>132</issuenum>
<pubdate>2005-10-12T16:15:07-04:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date: 2005-10-12 17:47:19 -0400 (Wed, 12 Oct 2005) $</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2005</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>In email, and now in blogs.</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Email"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Spam"/>
</info>

<epigraph>
<para>Illigitimi non carborundum.</para>
</epigraph>

<para xml:id="p1">One of my “ego surf” feeds tripped over a reference to
“<link xlink:href="http://www.hpcalc.org/details.php?id=1453">Binary
Display</link>” this morning. That's a bit of
<link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_Polish_notation">RPN</link>
code that I wrote for my
<link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP48">HP48</link>
calculator back in…1998! That's pretty amusing<footnote>
<para>I still use that code
on my HP48, though before today I'd have had no idea where to get it from
if I ever lost it!</para>
    </footnote>. It'd be more amusing
if the reference wasn't on a page that's an example of that rising
scourge of the web: blog spam.
</para>

<para>I haven't a clue what to do about blog spam, but
blog spam reminded me that my 
<link xlink:href="/2005/01/15/spam">previous essay</link> about fighting
email spam has been quite popular and it was probably time for an update.
After almost a year, I'm quite happy with
<link xlink:href="http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam">DSPAM</link>.
At some point, a wave
of virus email inspired me to install
<link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clamav">ClamAV</link> too.
</para>

<para>My new setup is:</para>

<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Download mail to my laptop from various personal and corporate
servers.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Run the incoming mail through
<application>ClamAV</application>, throwing all the viruses into the
bit bucket.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Run the mail that remains through <application>DSPAM</application>,
capturing spam in a spool that I discard every few days. Sometimes I try
to see if there are any false positives, but most times my attempts are
cursory at best. If you send me mail about making easy money, augmenting
my anatomy,
<link xlink:href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warez">warez</link>,
prescriptions, or containing salacious invitations, I probably won't
see it.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>I collect false negatives, on the order of ten or twenty a day,
in a folder. Every now and then I run all those messages through DSPAM
marking them as spam.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>

<para>It seems to be working.</para>

</essay>

