norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard/comments.atom 2005-12-16T10:29:08Z Comment 1 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0001 2005-12-13T08:57:11Z 2005-12-13T08:57:11Z Benjamin Nowack 1955cb9ba8ae4b19f7ae120363354d816c0a92b6 http://www.bnode.org/

Heyup Norm, there are rdfs:subClassOfs + property restrictions associated with properties instead of classes.

 Comment 2 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0002 2005-12-13T10:35:02Z 2005-12-13T10:35:02Z Susan 86c1963953605f5261f3f8a83d36ecd384fabeb7 http://www.swoclassifieds.com/

Really useful, thanks.

 Comment 3 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0003 2005-12-13T11:20:26Z 2005-12-13T11:20:26Z Norman Walsh 9f5c771a25733700b2f96af4f8e6f35c9b0ad327 http://norman.walsh.name/

*Blush* Thank you, Benjamin. I knew I was rushing. Fixed.

 Comment 4 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0004 2005-12-13T22:23:48Z 2005-12-13T22:23:48Z Dan Connolly 94b6eb0c835f928c5ed565dc3ed1a355ac1b41e5 http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

"1"^^xs:nonNegativeInteger is a mouthful; in N3/turtle, you can just write 1.

 Comment 5 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0005 2005-12-14T12:59:34Z 2005-12-14T12:59:34Z Reto 63267630b67d56a6fca96d01bfc324d7e0a31df1

Hi Norm, not sure anout the cardinality on v:rev. What happens whan a vcard changes (say you add a v:sound), does it gets a new uid and it becomes a new and distinct vcard-resource, or does it keep the uid and get's the v:rev replaced which makes the new graph a contradiction to the previous one? I think the easiest would be to allow multiple v:rev.

 Comment 6 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0006 2005-12-14T13:13:22Z 2005-12-14T13:13:22Z Norman Walsh 9f5c771a25733700b2f96af4f8e6f35c9b0ad327 http://norman.walsh.name/

Yeah, I don't know about the cardinality of v:rev either. My thinking was: if tracking revisions is important enough to you that you've bothered to put a v:rev property on your objects, you probably want to keep them distinct somehow. Once you find a v:VCard with two v:rev properties, you can be sure you've got no way to reconstruct either revision from the collection of properties on that v:VCard.

But it's probably still a bad idea to impose the cardinality restriction, I suppose.

 Comment 7 on /2005/12/12/vcard http://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard#comment0007 2005-12-16T10:29:07Z 2005-12-16T10:29:07Z Dave Pawson b46b0bd3946a0e2c96f45361a4be380edcd98ed6 http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Could you provide a couple of instances please Norm, one form or another; fictitious or otherwise - it would help in comprehension for those trailing?

TIA DaveP