norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2005/12/12/vcard/comments.atom2012-02-13T06:16:53.118458ZComment 1 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012005-12-13T08:57:11Z2005-12-13T08:57:11ZBenjamin Nowackda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Heyup Norm, there are rdfs:subClassOfs + property restrictions associated with properties instead of classes.

Comment 2 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022005-12-13T10:35:02Z2005-12-13T10:35:02ZSusanda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Really useful, thanks.

Comment 3 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00032005-12-13T11:20:26Z2005-12-13T11:20:26ZNorman Walshda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

*Blush* Thank you, Benjamin. I knew I was rushing. Fixed.

Comment 4 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00042005-12-13T22:23:48Z2005-12-13T22:23:48ZDan Connollyda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

"1"^^xs:nonNegativeInteger is a mouthful; in N3/turtle, you can just write 1.

Comment 5 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00052005-12-14T12:59:34Z2005-12-14T12:59:34ZRetoda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Hi Norm, not sure anout the cardinality on v:rev. What happens whan a vcard changes (say you add a v:sound), does it gets a new uid and it becomes a new and distinct vcard-resource, or does it keep the uid and get's the v:rev replaced which makes the new graph a contradiction to the previous one? I think the easiest would be to allow multiple v:rev.

Comment 6 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00062005-12-14T13:13:22Z2005-12-14T13:13:22ZNorman Walshda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Yeah, I don't know about the cardinality of v:rev either. My thinking was: if tracking revisions is important enough to you that you've bothered to put a v:rev property on your objects, you probably want to keep them distinct somehow. Once you find a v:VCard with two v:rev properties, you can be sure you've got no way to reconstruct either revision from the collection of properties on that v:VCard.

But it's probably still a bad idea to impose the cardinality restriction, I suppose.

Comment 7 on /2005/12/12/vcardhttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00072005-12-16T10:29:07Z2005-12-16T10:29:07ZDave Pawsonda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Could you provide a couple of instances please Norm, one form or another; fictitious or otherwise - it would help in comprehension for those trailing?

TIA DaveP