norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2006/02/14/feedshttp://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/14/feeds/comments.atom2012-02-13T06:18:30.492525ZComment 1 on /2006/02/14/feedshttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012006-02-15T00:15:00Z2006-02-15T00:15:00ZKen MacLeodda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Hi Norm, in RSS/RDF 1.0 the content model for <title> and <description> is (#PCDATA), further constrained than the general "is XML and RDF" statement.

Unfortunately the portion of the RSS/RDF Content module that does support rdf:parseType="Literal" is pretty well botched and I'm not aware of any clients that support it.

Comment 2 on /2006/02/14/feedshttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022006-02-16T02:08:33Z2006-02-16T02:08:33ZKen MacLeodda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Since RSS/RDF text elements are plain text, you should let those character entities go out as-is. Newsreaders that get it wrong are not spec compliant.