<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2006/02/23/changingSAX</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/23/changingSAX"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/23/changingSAX/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T08:42:02.244118Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2006/02/23/changingSAX</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/23/changingSAX#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2006-02-27T08:30:38Z</published><updated>2006-02-27T08:30:38Z</updated><author><name>Adam Fitzpatrick</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>I wonder if it's also worth a look at the somewhat misguidedly overridden toString() method in SAXException, which has tripped me up from time to time. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lurking.org/2006/02/SAXExceptionQuirk.java">This example class</a> shows how wrapping an exception in a SAXException can produce a mangled stack trace, containing the class name and message from the nested exception, but the stack trace of the SAXException.
</p>
    <p>
I realise a comment in your blog is hardly the best place to report this problem. I intended to write a comment to the effect of "it would be nice if SAXException didn't produce broken stack traces", but then I realised I couldn't remember exactly <em>how</em> it was broken, so I ended up firing up Eclipse to get my head around the problem again. Is that mailing list you linked to the best place to ask, or is this a known issue that would be redundant?</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

