norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2006/04/11/xprocReqUsehttp://norman.walsh.name/2006/04/11/xprocReqUse/comments.atom2012-02-13T08:53:35.924394ZComment 1 on /2006/04/11/xprocReqUsehttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012006-04-11T21:09:14Z2006-04-11T21:09:14ZSjoerd Visscherda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

This is looking really good!

Comment 2 on /2006/04/11/xprocReqUsehttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022006-04-11T23:02:45Z2006-04-11T23:02:45ZFlorent Georgesda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Very good news. Seems promising!

--drkm

Comment 3 on /2006/04/11/xprocReqUsehttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00032006-06-26T17:25:27Z2006-06-26T17:25:27ZAnthony B. Coatesda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Cool. I will be interested to see how this compares to what I do now within Apache Ant. One thing I would want a pipeline to be able to do is to be able to generate a series of temporary XML documents as an intermediate step, and then be able to iterate over them for a later step. I find this kind of thing very useful for separating actual processing from reporting at the end of the pipeline. Cheers, Tony.