<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2006/05/23/backOnline</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/05/23/backOnline"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/05/23/backOnline/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T08:41:34.532863Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2006/05/23/backOnline</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/05/23/backOnline#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2006-05-24T04:22:41Z</published><updated>2006-05-24T04:22:41Z</updated><author><name>John Cowan</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Google for the phrase "revolution of rising expectations"; I think that accounts for most of the disappointment over the JDL.  People have been psyched for a full open-sourcing announcement, and when they got something else, their expectations were deflated with a crash.  Naturally they resent it, and say so at great length.  It's not pretty, or even rational, but it is predictable.</p>

<p>BTW, you should stop saying that all attributes will be discarded; a/@href is not, fortunately.</p>

<p>Wanna consider upgrading to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.tagsoup.info/tagsoup-1.0rc6.jar">the latest TagSoup</a>?  I'm hoping this one will be really be 1.0, if no more defect reports come in.  And I want to persuade Tim to use it in the spiffy new comments system he's designing.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2006/05/23/backOnline</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/05/23/backOnline#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2006-05-24T10:43:44Z</published><updated>2006-05-24T10:43:44Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Done and done, John. Thanks for pointing out the oversight about attributes. I started allowing anchors with "rel='nofollow'" some time ago but forgot to update that text. And thanks for TagSoup!</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 3 on /2006/05/23/backOnline</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/05/23/backOnline#comment0003"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0003</id><published>2006-05-24T23:10:08Z</published><updated>2006-05-24T23:10:08Z</updated><author><name>drew</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>I recommend aptitude over apt-get (and apt-cache and some of dpkg). You just need to start using the one command ("aptitude") and you'll probably have a trivial transition from the lower-level commands. "aptitude search soup"; "aptitude install python-beautifulsoup"; "aptitude upgrade"; etc.
</p>
    <p>
Advantages: quicker to type ("apti" should be enough), better logging in case you get into trouble, pretty nice curses UI if you don't give any commands.</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

