<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T06:41:36.043157Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2006-07-12T14:17:35Z</published><updated>2006-07-12T14:17:35Z</updated><author><name>David Carlisle</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>maybe it's the XDM-spec syndrome biting again but
The rnc linked from this page seems to be
</p>
    <p>
# $Id: xslt20.rnc,v 1.3 2005/04/19 11:51:35 ndw Exp $
</p>
    <p>
ie a version from last year, without the changes described.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2006-07-12T14:28:49Z</published><updated>2006-07-12T14:28:49Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>In fact, I think the RNC was correct but, (a) I forgot to tell Subversion to update the <code>$Id$</code> keyword and, (b) I forgot to update the Change Log. Both fixed now.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 3 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0003"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0003</id><published>2006-07-12T14:37:10Z</published><updated>2006-07-12T14:37:10Z</updated><author><name>David Carlisle</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>&gt; both fixed now.
</p>
    <p>
and it validates my current stylesheet, thanks.
(and for making comments visible)</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 4 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0004"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0004</id><published>2006-07-13T05:53:55Z</published><updated>2006-07-13T05:53:55Z</updated><author><name>Todd Ditchendorf</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Hi Norman... Thanks for these schemas! Excuse me for pimping my software, but I've just released a free Cocoa app called XML Nanny that will graphically validate your instance docs against RNC, RNG, DTD, WXS and Schematron. I thought you mightl like to try it with your RNCs, I just did. It was fun :)</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 5 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0005"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0005</id><published>2006-07-13T16:59:24Z</published><updated>2006-07-13T16:59:24Z</updated><author><name>Todd Ditchendorf</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Woopsie... <a rel="nofollow" href="http://xmlnanny.com">XML Nanny</a></p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 6 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0006"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0006</id><published>2007-06-04T15:35:32Z</published><updated>2007-06-04T15:35:32Z</updated><author><name>Ben Norman</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Thank you for these schema, Norman!  I've been using NXML mode for a while with my XSLT 1.0 docs, but I was annoyed with the inability to validate XSLT 2.0 on the fly.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 7 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0007"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0007</id><published>2010-10-28T23:21:27Z</published><updated>2010-10-28T23:21:27Z</updated><author><name>Piet van Oostrum</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I found an error in your XSLT 2.0 schema. In xsl:number it says
that the select attribute is mandatory but the XSLT spec says it is
optional. Actually when you use the value attribute, select isn't
even allowed. I added a ? after "<code>attribute select {
expression.datatype }</code>" in element number.</p></div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 8 on /2006/07/12/xslt20</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/07/12/xslt20#comment0008"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0008</id><published>2010-11-08T12:05:03Z</published><updated>2010-11-08T12:05:03Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I'm confused, Piet. The "?" is clearly in the xslt20.rnc file
linked from this page, so I'm not sure what you changed.</p>
<p>There were earlier versions of xslt20.rnc that might have had
that bug, do you possibly have one of them?</p></div></content></entry></feed>

