<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>Photo printing and Linux</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2006/09/23/printing</biblioid>
<volumenum>9</volumenum>
<issuenum>89</issuenum>
<pubdate>2006-09-23T16:02:48-04:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date: 2006-09-24 09:37:31 -0400 (Sun, 24 Sep 2006) $</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2006</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>When we bought a high-end photo printer, I resigned myself to running
a Windows box to drive it. Troubles with VMWare pushed me to investigate
more closely and I was delighted to find a Linux solution: TurboPrint.
</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Linux"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Photography"/>
</info>

<para xml:id="p1">The back story to this essay is that we bought a
<link xlink:href="https://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&amp;fcategoryid=117&amp;modelid=9870">Canon i9900</link>
printer (kudos to
<wikipedia page="Canon_Inc.">Canon</wikipedia> for reasonable looking, and hopefully
persistent, URIs). What I realized is that while <emphasis>I</emphasis>
get a lot of enjoyment out of our pictures online,
<personname>
      <firstname>Deb</firstname>
      <surname role="suppress">Walsh</surname>
    </personname>
and others would sometimes enjoy them more if they were presented more
traditionally.</para>

<para xml:id="p2">So I dug around a bit on the net, got some advice from
<personname>
      <firstname>Lauren</firstname>
<surname role="suppress">Wood</surname>
    </personname>
(who had
<link xlink:href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/12/19/Canon-i9900">already
picked</link> the i9900), and eventually choose the i9900 too. There's no question,
it makes wonderful prints. I mean seriously, knock your socks off, wonderful prints.</para>

<para xml:id="p3">But a quick look at
<link xlink:href="http://www.linuxprinting.org/">Linux
Printing.org</link> support for
<link xlink:href="http://www.linuxprinting.org/printer_list.cgi?make=Canon">
Canon printers</link> pretty clearly excludes the i9900. I knew that going in
and fully expected to have to run a Windows box to drive it.</para>

<para xml:id="p4">But I don't have a license for another Windows box, so I thought maybe I
could drive it from VMWare. I got all the Canon drivers installed without any trouble,
plugged the printer into my laptop, connected the device to my VMWare session,
and printed. Can you say
<wikipedia page="Blue_Screen_of_Death">BSOD</wikipedia>? I knew you could.
(I could, I probably should, spend some time reporting that bug, but I haven't
bothered yet).</para>

<para xml:id="p5">While searching for answers to that BSOD problem, I stumbled across
<link xlink:href="http://www.turboprint.info/">TurboPrint</link>.
<citetitle>TurboPrint for
Linux</citetitle> is a set of commercial printer drivers that includes
support for the i9900 and a host of other high-end printers. They integrate with
CUPS and LPR/LPRng and work like a charm.</para>

<para xml:id="p6">For a quite reasonable 29.95€, I have a working set of drivers that do
everything, right up to the i9900's spectacular 13x19" “A3+ borderless” size.
And let's just be clear: photos look <emphasis>good</emphasis> at that size.
</para>

<para xml:id="p7">Now my dilemma is that if I'm going to print them, and clearly I
am, I'm going to want even better control over the images. Anyone know of a good
“digital photo editing” book for
<wikipedia>GIMP</wikipedia> users? (I can probably learn to do the mental gymnastics
of conversion from one of the Adobe programs if necessary, but if I don't have to
do that before I really understand the difference between contrast masks and colorspaces,
all the better.)</para>

</essay>

