<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>DocBook V4.5</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2006/10/04/docbook45</biblioid>
<volumenum>9</volumenum>
<issuenum>92</issuenum>
<pubdate>2006-10-04T10:04:01-07:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date: 2006-10-04 13:23:54 -0400 (Wed, 04 Oct 2006) $</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2006</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>It's official: DocBook V4.5 is an OASIS Standard.</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#DocBook"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#OASIS"/>
</info>

<epigraph>
<attribution>
      <personname>
	<firstname>Henry</firstname>
<surname>Ford</surname>
      </personname>
    </attribution>
<para xml:id="p2">If you think of standardization as the best
that you know today, but which is to be improved tomorrow; you get
somewhere.</para>
</epigraph>

<para xml:id="p1">DocBook V4.5 has been winding its way slowly towards
“OASIS Standard” status for more than a year: our first test release
occurred in May, 2005.
</para>

<para xml:id="p3">There are only
<link xlink:href="http://docbook.org/specs/docbook-4.5-spec.html#release">a few
improvements</link> in V4.5 as compared to V4.4, which was published in
January, 2005. However, there are a great many improvements as compared to
V4.1, the last OASIS Standard version of DocBook. DocBook V4.1 was
published in December, 2003. The changes since V4.1 are summarized in
<link xlink:href="http://docbook.org/specs/cs-docbook-docbook-4.2.html#s.changes4">V4.2</link>,
<link xlink:href="http://docbook.org/specs/cd-docbook-docbook-4.3.html#s.cs">V4.3</link>, and
<link xlink:href="http://docbook.org/specs/cd-docbook-docbook-4.4.html#s.csfinal">V4.4</link> as well as
<link xlink:href="http://docbook.org/specs/docbook-4.5-spec.html#release">V4.5</link>.
</para>

<para xml:id="p4">The significance of V4.5 doesn't stem from comparison with V4.4 (or even
V4.0, for that matter), rather it stems from comparison with V5.0: DocBook V4.5
is very likely to be the last release in the V4.x series.</para>

<para xml:id="p5">Changing the major version number in DocBook has often marked the end of
one era and the beginning of another:</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para xml:id="p6">V3.0 marked the end of a fairly monolithic structure and the beginning of an
intensely parameterized, highly customizable DTD.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para xml:id="p7">V4.0 marked, if not the end of SGML, the introduction of XML DTD
as an official, normative format.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para xml:id="p8">V5.0 marks the end of the DTD era and the beginning of the RELAX NG
era.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para xml:id="p9">Looking farther forward, it seems likely that the V6.0 transition will
be a less dramatic event. Recall that our change policy states that backwards
incompatible changes can only be made in major versions and I expect we'll get
to some backwards incompatible change before there's another revolution.
But I've been wrong before.</para>

<para xml:id="p10">Congratulations to the DocBook Technical Committee and the whole
DocBook community on achieving OASIS Standard status for DocBook V4.5, a milestone
event in DocBook development.</para>

</essay>

