<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>Life after email</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2006/10/20/lifeAfterEmail</biblioid>
<volumenum>9</volumenum>
<issuenum>100</issuenum>
<pubdate>2006-10-20T12:02:22-04:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date: 2006-10-20 12:58:43 -0400 (Fri, 20 Oct 2006) $</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2006</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>Reports indicate that as a social phenomenon, email is dying out.
As a technical phenomenon, spam is killing it. So what's an old codger
to do?</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Email"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#RSS"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Spam"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TheWeb"/>
</info>

<epigraph>
<attribution>
      <personname>
<surname>Bion</surname>
</personname>
    </attribution>
<para xml:id="p2">We ought not to heap reproaches
on old age, seeing that we all hope to reach it.</para>
</epigraph>

<para xml:id="p1">As a social phenomenon, the end of email has been
<link xlink:href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;q=%22end+of+email+%22">widely
reported</link>. The next generation doesn't use it. As a technical
phenomenon,
<wikipedia page="E-mail_spam">spam</wikipedia> is a persistent threat. Spam's been a
lot worse in the last couple of weeks (no doubt the reason I started thinking
about these things); apparently the spammers have
concocted a strategy that circumvents
<wikipedia page="Bayesian_spam_filtering">Bayesian filtering</wikipedia> (it's only
temporary, I'm sure, but the next victory in spam filtering is only
temporary too).</para>

<para xml:id="p3">What's next?
<wikipedia page="Instant_messaging">IM</wikipedia>,
<wikipedia page="Wiki">Wikis</wikipedia>,
<wikipedia page="Internet_forum">web forums</wikipedia> instead of email? Bleh!</para>

<para xml:id="p4">Maybe I'm just too old to learn new tricks, but I want correspondence pushed
to me (or I want the appearance of push, anyway) and I want to read and edit it
locally, in the application of my choosing, not in some browser form.</para>

<para xml:id="p5">It occurs to me that with a little work,
<wikipedia page="Atom_%28standard%29">Atom</wikipedia> might function as a replacement
for
<wikipedia page="Post_Office_Protocol">POP</wikipedia>/<wikipedia page="Internet_Message_Access_Protocol">IMAP</wikipedia>
and the Atom publishing protocol might replace
<wikipedia page="Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol">SMTP</wikipedia>.
I can see a glimmer of how I might move forward while mostly
preserving a couple of decades of work habits. As usual, the social problems
are larger than the technical ones.</para>

<para xml:id="p6">Google reveals that these are not new ideas, so this essay is
little more than a chance for me to vent a bit (sorry about that).
I'll see if I can sketch out some of my ideas in a little more detail.
Or maybe I'll see if I can integrate Atom and the Atom Publishing
Protocol into my <wikipedia>Emacs</wikipedia> mail reader…</para>

</essay>

