<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2007/05/30/implXProcV</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/05/30/implXProcV"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2007/05/30/implXProcV/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-05-23T11:49:46.354565Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2007/05/30/implXProcV</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/05/30/implXProcV#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2007-05-31T17:31:23Z</published><updated>2007-05-31T17:31:23Z</updated><author><name>Chris Scott</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Great news Norm!.  It's good to hear that progress is being made.  One question though, why worry too much about spec-conformance when the spec is still a moving target?  Release early, release often right?
</p>
    <p>
Also do you know if anybody else from the working-group is planning on is working on or planning to release an implementation?
</p>
    <p>
I'm not sure if I know of any actively developing implementations.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2007/05/30/implXProcV</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/05/30/implXProcV#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2007-05-31T18:21:01Z</published><updated>2007-05-31T18:21:01Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>I'm not going to worry about it too much, but right now I've implemented things that aren't in the current spec and may not be accepted by the WG for the next spec, so I think it would be just too confusing.
</p>
    <p>
I think several other WG members are working on implementations and I've heard of two others by non-WG members so I think it's looking good.</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

