norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2007/07/06/xprochttp://norman.walsh.name/2007/07/06/xproc/comments.atom2012-02-13T06:18:21.616801ZComment 1 on /2007/07/06/xprochttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00012007-07-08T01:02:50Z2007-07-08T01:02:50ZRick Jelliffeda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Please get rid of the term "port"! It adds a concept where none is needed. Just say "input" and "output" and give them a name or id. I know Scheme is wonderful, but...

Comment 2 on /2007/07/06/xprochttp://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment00022007-07-09T12:26:15Z2007-07-09T12:26:15ZNorman Walshda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709

Are you sure, Rick? I'm not sure it would read as clearly if we couldn't distinguish between the inputs and outputs that flow between steps and the _____ on the steps where the inputs and outputs are "attached".