<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>Jabber me</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2007/08/01/jabber</biblioid>
<volumenum>10</volumenum>
<issuenum>76</issuenum>
<pubdate>2007-08-01T18:20:04-04:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date$</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2007</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>I find that IM strikes a nearly perfect balance between the latency
of email and the invasiveness of a phone call. And I think Russell is right,
jabber is the way to go.</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#IM"/>
</info>

<epigraph>
<attribution>
      <personname>
<firstname>Dorothy</firstname>
	<surname>Nevill</surname>
</personname>
    </attribution>
<para xml:id="p2">The real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the
right place but to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting
moment.</para>
</epigraph>

<para xml:id="p1">For years (maybe decades), email has been my preferred
communication vehicle for most purposes. If you send me email on an average
day, I'll see it within a few minutes. (I may not answer it for hours, days,
weeks, … well, you get the picture, but that's a different issue.)</para>

<para xml:id="p3">What's important to me is, your email won't interrupt my
debugging session or my conference call or my attempt to think deep
thoughts.</para>

<para xml:id="p4">But sometimes a lag of even tens of minutes is too long.
Sometimes my friends and colleagues need information (or need to know
if I have the information they need) <emphasis>right now</emphasis>.
That's the perfect case for <wikipedia page="Instant_messaging">IM</wikipedia>.
If you send me an IM, I'll see it in a
few seconds. But if I'm deep in debugging, I can still ignore you for
a few tens of seconds.</para>

<para xml:id="p5">If you call me on the phone, you're demanding all of my
attention right now. Debugging context: gone; conference call:
missed; deep thoughts: evaporated. That's fine, if you really need all
of my attention this minute, of course. But how often is that?
I'm just not that important.</para>

<para xml:id="p6">Conversely, I know my friends and colleagues are busy. “Do you
have any items for the agenda for tomorrow's meeting?” is a question I
would like answered in the next few minutes, but I don't think it
requires interrupting you with a phone call.</para>

<para xml:id="p7">That's a long-winded way of saying I quite like IM. Via
<personname xlink:href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/07/26/Russ-is-Back">
<firstname>Tim</firstname>
      <surname role="suppress">Bray</surname>
    </personname>,
I found that
<personname>
      <firstname>Russell</firstname>
      <surname>Beattie</surname>
    </personname>
is
<link xlink:href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/blog">blogging
again</link> (Welcome back, Russell!)</para>

<para xml:id="p8">One of the first of his new posts that I read was
<link xlink:href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/blog/i-am-jabber-powered">I
Am Jabber Powered!</link> in which he argues for
using <wikipedia page="Extensible_Messaging_and_Presence_Protocol">Jabber</wikipedia>.
Convincingly I think. (He's also
<link xlink:href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/blog/distributed-revision-control-systems-git-vs-mercurial-vs-svn">trying out Mercurial</link>, coincidentally.)</para>

<para xml:id="p9">Anyway, henceforth, my preferred IM ID is this one:
<literal>ndw@im.nwalsh.com</literal> via Jabber.</para>

</essay>

