<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2007/10/18/mojo</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/10/18/mojo"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2007/10/18/mojo/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-02-13T04:06:13.32578Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2007/10/18/mojo</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/10/18/mojo#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2007-10-19T00:06:59Z</published><updated>2007-10-19T00:06:59Z</updated><author><name>Gabe Wachob</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Hey Norm-
   You might also find <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lypp.com">Lypp</a> interesting - similar offering, also a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lypp.com/api">REST API</a></p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2007/10/18/mojo</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/10/18/mojo#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2007-10-19T06:55:43Z</published><updated>2007-10-19T06:55:43Z</updated><author><name>Paul Downey</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Hah, thanks for the great review Norm! This is pretty much stelth mode, but it's just a simple wrap for the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://web21c.bt.com">Web21C</a> Web services. There are a bunch of people exposing telephones onto the Web in various shapes and forms, and that's great because it's creating a market the old school cannot ignore. We're breaking down the walls of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.slideshare.net/psd/mashing-up-the-mobile">The Ministry of Telco</a>!  What's great about BT is this is very much just a toe in the water, and if it "works" we've a ton of great stuff to release onto the Web so people like yourselves can build silly and useful stuff. Fun times ahead!</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 3 on /2007/10/18/mojo</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/10/18/mojo#comment0003"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0003</id><published>2007-10-19T08:24:13Z</published><updated>2007-10-19T08:24:13Z</updated><author><name>Mike Taylor</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Like Gabe mentioned in an earlier comment, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lypp.com">Lypp</a> offers a similiar service with the additional feature that you can drive it via IM.</p>
  </div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 4 on /2007/10/18/mojo</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2007/10/18/mojo#comment0004"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0004</id><published>2007-10-19T11:49:16Z</published><updated>2007-10-19T11:49:16Z</updated><author><name>mighty fish</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Looking at it the lypp and mojo security models seem pretty different.
</p>
    <p>
Lypp just wraps basic authentication, whereas from what I can see here mojo has stronger security model. I wonder if BT are considering oAuth?</p>
  </div></content></entry></feed>

