<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>Houston, you are go for comments</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2008/01/23/commentsEnabled</biblioid>
<volumenum>11</volumenum>
<issuenum>14</issuenum>
<pubdate>2008-01-23T10:13:12-05:00</pubdate>
<date>$Date$</date>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2008</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>Something broke a bit of logical inference in the
build system. Without the inference that comments were allowed,
they weren't. Fixed now.</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#SelfReference"/>
</info>

<para xml:id="p1">Crud. I upgraded some bits a week or so ago and comments
stopped working. Why logical inference is necessary to enable comments
is an intresting story about authoring laziness, RDF, and open world
assumptions.</para>

<para xml:id="p2">But I don't have time to tell that story right now.</para>

</essay>

