Vancouver Canada is listed as Vancouver CA for some reason..

It didn't do well with Galway. When I clicked on Galway, it went to the coast near the Burren rather than Galway. And a bunch of pictures we took in Galway don't show up, such as parade

"CA" is the ISO country code for Canada, Yes? If there is a Vancouver in California, it'll appear as "Vancouver, CA, US".

I'll see about centering the pictures better. At the moment, I simply uses the median latitude and longitude of all the photos identified as being in a particular place. For Galway, that seems to produce odd results. Maybe I need to adjust the scale, or weight the results, or something.

Finally, the "Parade" picture isn't identified as geotagged. Did you place that picture on the map by hand, or add GPS information to the EXIF? I'll see if I can find an efficient way to get Flickr to tell me about its location.

Very cool application. But, I noticed that all of the pictures I tried to view on your local page (the one with your pictures) have broken links to flickr. The thumbnail pops up fine, but when you click on the picture, flickr comes up with a "bad link" page.

I had no problem with any of the other locations I tried.

I figured out the "Parade" picture. You have a whole series of images with exactly the same latitude and longitude. Because the resulting marks would be exactly on top of each other, and there's no notion of "z-order" AFAICS in Google Maps, a marker is only generated for the first image on any given coordinate.

I suppose I could see about generating something like "And nn more images at the same spot" or something. Maybe.

How embarrassing, I couldn't get my own photo links right. Fixed now. Stupid implementation hack that leaked out.