<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<essay xml:lang="en" version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:gal="http://norman.walsh.name/rdf/gallery#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
<info>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
<title>Pandora killed the radio star</title><biblioid class="uri">http://norman.walsh.name/2008/07/29/pandora</biblioid>
<volumenum>11</volumenum>
<issuenum>54</issuenum>
<pubdate>2008-07-29T10:43:39-04:00</pubdate>
<author>
      <personname>
<firstname>Norman</firstname>
	<surname>Walsh</surname>
</personname>
    </author>
<copyright>
      <year>2008</year>
      <holder>Norman Walsh</holder>
    </copyright>
<abstract>
<para>Commercial free music on your own personal radio station.</para>
</abstract>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#Music"/>
<dc:subject rdf:resource="http://norman.walsh.name/knows/taxonomy#TheWeb"/>
</info>

<para xml:id="p1"><wikipedia>Buggles</wikipedia> got it wrong: video
was never a threat to the radio star. Don't get me wrong, I like a
good music video as much as the next guy; I'm even old enough to
remember when <wikipedia>MTV</wikipedia> played them. (I think, but I
won't swear, that I saw the inaugural broadcast of <wikipedia>Video
Killed the Radio Star</wikipedia>.) But I listen to music in all sorts
of places where I can't or won't watch videos: while I'm driving and
while I'm working, to name just two.
</para>

<para xml:id="p2">I like to listen to music while I work (or at least, while I'm
programming, not so much when I'm reading or writing), but I find the
spoken word <emphasis>totally</emphasis> distracting. It's just a
personal quirk, but while I can happily code through hours of music, a
single radio DJ break or commercial completely derails me.
So “internet radio” is as useless for my purposes as a regular radio.</para>

<para xml:id="p3">For years I've been listening to music off my iPod (or off my
laptop). I know lots of folks who build extensive playlists, but I'm
lazy, I just put the whole thing on shuffle. It works great, and with
several days of music in the mix, I don't get many repeats. But I also don't get
any new music unless I buy it. And if I don't hear it, how will I know I
want to buy it? Catch 22.</para>

<para xml:id="p4">No more. If you live in the United States, you can listen to
music on <wikipedia page="Pandora_radio">Pandora</wikipedia>. The way
it works is you “seed” a “station” with a song or artist (or several)
and Pandora plays music by that artist and other tracks that are
“like” that song or artist. What constitutes “like” is determined by
the algorithms of the <wikipedia>Music Genome
Project</wikipedia>.</para>

<para xml:id="p5">It works <emphasis>incredibly</emphasis> well (at least for me).
Feel like a little <wikipedia>Kirsty MacColl</wikipedia>, there it is.
Feeling more like a little <wikipedia page="Clinic_(band)">Clinic</wikipedia>, there you go. Feeling
like…well, you get the idea. And by seeding with several artists, you
can get a more eclectic mix. Personally, I find the results of seeding
with only a single artist a little bit of “too much the same”, which I guess
is a testament to the accuracy of the algorithms.
And if Pandora picks a song you don't like, you can give it a “thumbs down”
to remove it from that station.</para>

<para xml:id="p6">Five stars!</para>

</essay>

