The week in review, 140 characters at a time. This week, 124 messages in 138 conversations. (With 37 favorites.)
This document was created automatically from my archive of my Twitter stream. Due to limitations in the Twitter API and occasional glitches in my archiving system, it may not be 100% complete.
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 11:06am
"Vegetable" isn't in the fourth edition official Scrabble™ players dictionary. #randomobservations—@ndw
@ndw re 'vegetable' Its in the TWL list: http://www.mobipocket.com/en/eBooks/eBookDetails.asp?BookID=78536 (Android version coming soon)—@andrewwelch
@andrewwelch Good to know. :-) And do post when the Android edition is out!—@ndw
Monday at 01:58am

Monday at 06:40am
No, peerindex, you don't get write access to my twitter stream either. But thanks for playing.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 07:53am
Monday at 08:24am

Monday at 08:40am

In a conversation that started on Monday at 09:23am
Heard the phrase "social graph" on R4 Today programme. Gah. Stop now. Do I have to make a video asking normal people what a 'graph' is?—@tommorris
In a conversation that started on Monday at 09:33am
In a conversation that started on Monday at 09:43am
Looking for Readability on the iPad? Grab TweetMag. Full reading list and save support. Hello iOS! http://bit.ly/f8BuRK—@readability
Monday at 10:33am

Monday at 12:12pm

In a conversation that started on Monday at 12:32pm

@michaelhkay orange seems to live on a cheaper plant than AT&T. they always make me laugh be asking for $19.90 for each MB. #moonpricing—@dret
In a conversation that started on Monday at 12:38pm
"A Shared Innovation Platform". Blech.—@ndw
@ndw Heh, yeah that wasn't a good bit of Kasabi. Non marketing bits are neat.—@gcarothers
@gcarothers thx. Lots more to come!—@ldodds
@gcarothers Maybe when I can see the non-marketing bits...—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 12:44pm
ATT says T-Mobile customers will have to replace their phones? http://bit.ly/gMTinS #thisdealisgettingworseallthetime (http://bit.ly/ecKxsAA)—@bjepson
Monday at 12:56pm
Monday at 01:42pm
Monday at 02:05pm
In a conversation that started on Monday at 06:49pm
The Politics of Fighting: http://bit.ly/hDXbT4—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 06:53pm

@shelleypowers eventually?—@gcarothers
@gcarothers hee—@shelleypowers
Monday at 09:04pm
Knowing that my conversations and "favorited" tweets will appear in a future archive on my weblog makes conv. and favs. more valuable to me.—@ndw
Tuesday at 10:15am

Tuesday at 10:34am

In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 01:18pm
USPTO Gives Google Patent For Doodles http://bit.ly/dQRuJf—@slashdot
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 01:27pm
To clarify: my AT&T Motorola Atrix has no "Unknown sources" checkbox in the Applications preferences, needed for the Android appstore—@edd
Tuesday at 03:12pm
Interviewed for the internal newsletter. Oh pity me...—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 03:15pm
Google Spends $1 Million For Throttling Detection http://bit.ly/e5fAiR—@slashdot
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 03:20pm
A simple, two digit transposition in the 800 number for MET Life dental insurance is a phone sex line. #notthegreetingiexpected #funfacts—@ndw
Tuesday at 03:31pm
While I've no particular interest in the Amazon Appstore, I installed just for the joy of doing something AT&T wouldn't have let me do.—@ndw
Tuesday at 03:42pm

In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 03:52pm
and another fun link: PolarClock http://blog.pixelbreaker.com/polarclock—@marjoleink
@marjoleink Cool clock!—@ndw
Tuesday at 11:47pm

In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 05:16am
OK, that didn’t take long. Firefox 4 is nice and speedy, but still too non-native for me. Want Mac OS X Services and other integration.—@sentience
@ndw Now that you can write your own in AppleScript or shell script, and call them via right-click or keybd shortcut, they’re super useful.—@sentience
@ndw “Devon Technology's "Service Pack" is my favorite set of downloadable 3rd party services.” http://t.co/yan3YmQ—@sentience
@ndw And finally a nice “master list” of good Snow Leopard compatible services: http://t.co/ZscHsgF—@sentience
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 05:51am
Taking Firefox 4 for a test drive.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 07:48am
As promised to @jirkakosek xml-model support was implemented in oXygen before #xmlprague—@georgebina
@georgebina Congrats, George.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 07:54am
Wednesday at 08:30am
Buy DocBook: TDG and support Japanese Disaster Relief: http://oreil.ly/i8l52e (Or use the free, online version and send a bigger donation!)—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 08:32am
Maybe it's too early to start integrating HTML5 into the DocBook stylesheets. http://bit.ly/hVj888—@ndw
@ndw I'm not convinced by his "don't use JS" argument. I think that using a JS shim to fix ancient browsers is fine here, I'd go with that.—@robinberjon
@robinberjon @ndw At least "bullet-proofing" <section> with <div> misses the point entirely.—@hsivonen
@ndw @hsivonen Looking at http://berjon.com/blog/2010/01/creer-la-politique-sur-le-web.html in links seems pretty much okay.—@robinberjon
Wednesday at 08:32am
RT @ndw Maybe it's too early to start integrating HTML5 into the DocBook stylesheets. http://bit.ly/hVj888—@docbook
Wednesday at 08:45am
Taking votes? I say it's not. RT @ndw: Maybe it's too early to start integrating HTML5 into the DocBook stylesheets. http://bit.ly/hVj888—@lizfraley
Wednesday at 09:05am
Compared to Chrome (on the Mac), the full height title bar on Firefox looks big and wasteful of space.—@ndw
Wednesday at 10:39am
Wednesday at 10:42pm

In a conversation that started on Thursday at 04:23am
forgot about ctl-R for searching bash history ... handy that—@xquery
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 02:08pm
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 03:19pm
Waiting to see if the guy who broke the armrest clean off his seat just cancelled this flight. That's right buddy, hold it in place & smile—@ndw
@ndw I actually think they can take the seat out of service and fly the plane. Dude gets bumped if there aren't any open seats...—@sarahokeefe
@sarahokeefe Happily, you're right. And there were open seats. Arrived IAD. FRA, you're next.—@ndw
Thursday at 05:21pm

Thursday at 05:23pm
The "complimentary beer" in the United lounge is "Bud Light". Which part of "beer" don't they understand?—@ndw
Thursday at 08:49pm
@sentience @ndw Thanks for noticing my Services list! If you like Evernote Services, you might enjoy this recent one: http://bit.ly/hRD1Nu—@Veritrope
Saturday at 02:41am
Saturday at 02:47am
Saturday at 03:18am
Saturday at 03:19am
Saturday at 03:23am

Saturday at 03:25am
Saturday at 03:26am
Saturday at 03:27am
Saturday at 03:36am
Saturday at 03:41am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 03:45am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 03:50am
Saturday at 03:52am
Saturday at 04:03am
Saturday at 04:27am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 04:27am
I'll have to see if I can hack James' #Emacs schema-locating rules system to recognize the xml-model PI. #xmlprague—@ndw
@ndw xml-model PI published just as HTML bans processing instructions... so, now need an attribute instead?—@barefootliam
Saturday at 04:27am
Saturday at 05:08am

Saturday at 05:08am
Saturday at 05:10am
Saturday at 05:41am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 05:49am

Saturday at 05:49am
Saturday at 08:29am
Saturday at 08:48am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 09:55am
Lots of FF4 "sync can't connect to server". PITA.—@mikeloukides
@mikeloukides True dat.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 10:26am
Here are the slides from my #xmlprague talk: http://norman.walsh.name/2011/03/26/HTML-XML-Prague—@ndw
@ndw interesting. Depressing, but interesting.—@sarahokeefe
Saturday at 10:29am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 10:30am
Saturday at 10:45am
Saturday at 10:57am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:01am
docbook -- what evil genius it required to lure so many well-meaning individuals into such regular misery. #xmlprague—@aljopainter
@aljopainter Indeed. #DocBook is the worst system for technical documentation except for all the others. (With apologies to W. Churchill.)—@ndw
Saturday at 11:05am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:07am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:15am
ooh @michaelhkay just dissed @jpcs nice preso that he hasn't even presented yet #xmlprague—@eedeebee
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:18am
ooh #xslt streaming sounds like "making things more complex for developers" rather than "making things easier" #xmlprague #maybeidontgetit—@eedeebee
Saturday at 11:20am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:21am
Thinking that xproc will need a revamp to get it to play nice with xslt30. #xmlprague—@aljopainter
@aljopainter Not clear to me. I am trying to fix #XMLCalabash so that I can “compile” down to Saxon pipes. #shouldjustwork #xmlprague #xproc—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:24am
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:28am
@ndw Wanting to be able to identify the output of xslt "orks in xproc .. a guess a similar wish for extra result-docs. #xmlprague—@aljopainter
@aljopainter I can’t parse that tweet. Let’s chat.—@ndw
Saturday at 03:58pm
RT @ndw: "Here are the slides from my #xmlprague talk: http://bit.ly/fUE5DP" A bit worrying... guess there must be good reasons...—@StianSigvartsen
Saturday at 04:54pm

Saturday at 06:59pm

Saturday at 07:15pm

Sunday at 12:55am
Sunday at 02:35am
The ᐸinnovimax/ᐳ Daily is out! http://bit.ly/fTmEYa ▸ Top stories today via @fgeorges @ndw—@innovimax
Sunday at 02:50am
Sunday at 02:50am
Sunday at 03:00am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 03:01am
@sgmlguru If I’m a superstar, you’re going to have to find some much, much grander adjective for @michaelhkay—@ndw
Sunday at 03:16am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 03:16am
Sunday at 03:19am
Sunday at 03:23am
Sunday at 03:25am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 03:27am
I wonder if I should change my twitter archiver to add support for archiving hashtag searches for events I attended.—@ndw
Sunday at 03:30am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 06:37am
#xmlprague DITA specilaizations in Dtds are imho a horrible invention. Hardly anyone can understand them, let alone implement.—@eriksiegel
Sunday at 06:46am
Wonder if I can adapt @georgebina's components to build typed object graphs (i.e. XDMs for Saxon) from RELAX NG schemas. #xmlprague—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 07:03am
Sunday at 07:13am
Sunday at 07:36am
I put a “safe mode” option in #XMLCalabash in an effort to help with injection problems for things like demo apps. #xmlprague—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 07:44am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 07:51am


Sunday at 07:56am
The editor’s draft of what will be the LC of XML Processor Profiles: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html #xmlprague—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 08:40am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 08:45am
@jpcs XRXX—@adamretter
@ndw thats it right! Imagine if I could have a .xml domain - that would be ace—@adamretter
Sunday at 08:47am
Sunday at 08:49am
@ndw @fgeorges (“*:nameâ€*) I see it (in XSLT) as a shortcut to process XML when one doesn't care of the (default) namespace #xmlprague—@olivierjeulin
Sunday at 08:50am
@ndw #xmlprague - *:x trouble comes in the browser when XHTML might or might be explicit default namespace... you can get islands of XHTML—@barefootliam
Sunday at 08:52am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 08:57am
@ndw well it's only a decade late. CSS ate that lunch. someday please...—@TerrisLinenbach
Sunday at 08:58am
Sunday at 08:59am
Sunday at 09:00am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 09:02am
Any of the X*intheBrowser demos show off things you can't do easiliy with Javascript itself? All of em built in javascript so... #xmlprague—@eedeebee
@eedeebee there's a difference in "it can be done" and "I can do it"... and XSLT/XQuery in the Browser might make that be, "I want to do it"—@barefootliam
@barefootliam yah makes the earlier tweet point from uche that this stuff is not for general web developers - only for XML experts.—@eedeebee
Sunday at 09:04am
Pro tip: if you’re going to project, make sure you’ve got very high contrast slides—@ndw
Sunday at 09:07am
Sunday at 09:12am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 09:38am
Sunday at 09:40am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 09:43am
@ndw human beings can use?like xhtml?—@capucinnolover
@ndw XML started out simple, so we worked night and day writing additional bloated specs to make it seem harder.—@david_megginson
Sunday at 09:45am
if you’re going to project, make sure you’ve got very high contrast slides /via @ndw—@ProTipClip
Sunday at 09:51am
Found some W3C (and others) specs in EPUB format at http://goo.gl/cgxxzz, and conversion tools at http://goo.gl/HKOVx (by @ndw)—@_sss_
Sunday at 09:51am
Sunday at 09:53am

In a conversation that started on Sunday at 09:53am
Sunday at 09:55am
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 10:51am
Sunday at 10:53am
See also: the previous week's review or the next week's review.
