<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"><title>norman.walsh.name: Comments on /2011/12/22/docbookXSD</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2011/12/22/docbookXSD"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2011/12/22/docbookXSD/comments.atom</id><updated>2012-05-24T00:08:33.235756Z</updated><entry><title>Comment 1 on /2011/12/22/docbookXSD</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2011/12/22/docbookXSD#comment0001"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0001</id><published>2011-12-22T20:58:28Z</published><updated>2011-12-22T20:58:28Z</updated><author><name>John Cowan</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Be aware that Xerces-C has many bugs, and that may people cannot
handle XSDs that X-C cannot process. I've run into this perhaps 3-4
times over the last year, where Trang generates XSDs that are
perfectly valid but can't be handled by X-C. (XML Spy used to have
this reputation, but I don't know if it's still true or not.)</p></div></content></entry><entry><title>Comment 2 on /2011/12/22/docbookXSD</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2011/12/22/docbookXSD#comment0002"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2010/09/25/oauth#comment0002</id><published>2011-12-22T22:13:53Z</published><updated>2011-12-22T22:13:53Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name><foaf:mbox_sha1sum>da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709</foaf:mbox_sha1sum></author><content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I meant Xerces-J. I've never used Xerces-C.</p></div></content></entry></feed>

