<feed xml:lang="EN-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><title>Norman.Walsh.name</title><subtitle>Norm's musings. Make of them what you will.</subtitle><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/"/><link rel="self" href="http://norman.walsh.name/atom/whatsnew.xml"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/atom/whatsnew.xml</id><updated>2012-02-09T12:15:14.823228Z</updated><author><name>Norman Walsh</name></author><entry><title>Timing is everything</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2009/05/07/timing"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2009/05/07/timing</id><published>2009-05-07T14:17:27Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:40:03.34063Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>TheWeb</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
So, AtomPub is a failure and RSS is dead. Anyone want to guess
what my conference presentation next week is about?
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Life after email</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/10/20/lifeAfterEmail"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/10/20/lifeAfterEmail</id><published>2006-10-20T16:02:22Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:23:15.416383Z</updated><dc:subject>Email</dc:subject><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>Spam</dc:subject><dc:subject>TheWeb</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
Reports indicate that as a social phenomenon, email is dying out.
As a technical phenomenon, spam is killing it. So what's an old codger
to do?
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>In praise of web 1.0</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/04/03/web10"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/04/03/web10</id><published>2006-04-03T21:38:47Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:19:53.97522Z</updated><dc:subject>Email</dc:subject><dc:subject>Gadgets</dc:subject><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>TheWeb</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
I'm as excited as the next web developer about the whiz-bang,
AJAX, JavaScript magic of web 2.0 interfaces, but let's not forget
that there's still value in designing workable interfaces for less
powerful browsers.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Feeds</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/14/feeds"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/14/feeds</id><published>2006-02-14T14:07:31Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:18:54.091345Z</updated><dc:subject>Atom</dc:subject><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
My plan to
remove RSS feeds
caused some consternation in the community. In addition to pointing
out some places where RSS is still needed, a workaround was proposed.
So, before I pull the plug, let's see if the
workaround will…work. [Update: no, it won't.]

</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>RSS R.I.P.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/01/rssrip"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2006/02/01/rssrip</id><published>2006-02-01T16:30:57Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:18:44.76517Z</updated><dc:subject>Atom</dc:subject><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
This is your two week warning: when I return from vacation, the
RSS feeds are going to go away.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Talk To Me</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/09/09/newComments"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/09/09/newComments</id><published>2004-09-09T23:35:53Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:02:44.170464Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>SelfReference</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
This evening I installed some new code for handling comments.
The significant new features are the ability to put HTML elements (a few of
them, anyway) in your comments and the ability to subscribe to the comments
on a particular essay.

</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Blogroll</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/09/01/blogroll"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/09/01/blogroll</id><published>2004-09-01T10:49:26Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T18:02:25.275483Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>SelfReference</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
When I first starting putting this site together, I constructed
a page that contained my “blogroll”. That page quickly became stale
and I gave up. A few days ago, the Bloglines tip drifted past that showed me how
to put the blogroll back, so here it is. Make of it what you will.

</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Tim on Keith and Angle Brackets</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/31/TimPlus"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/05/31/TimPlus</id><published>2004-05-31T19:57:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:59:14.179474Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
The world hardly needs me to point to something that Tim already has,
but that doesn’t mean I can resist
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Rebuked</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/01/14/rebuked"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/01/14/rebuked</id><published>2004-01-13T11:55:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:54:22.870631Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
Mark caught me serving broken XHTML. I wish my browser had done
me that favor.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>On Atom and Postel’s Law</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2004/01/12/postel"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2004/01/12/postel</id><published>2004-01-12T13:33:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:54:19.456384Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
While it’s true that a number of the political factors that influenced
the draconian, anti-Postel’s Law design of XML have gone away, I still
think that design is virtuous and correct.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>No Takers?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/11/17/challenge"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/11/17/challenge</id><published>2003-11-17T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:52:43.523901Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>TAG</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
I challenged the escaped markup crowd to build a feed. No one did.
Did no one notice, or did no one care? Or maybe no one succeeded?
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Escaped Markup: What To Do Instead</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/18/unescmarkup"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/18/unescmarkup</id><published>2003-09-18T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:51:04.159832Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
I've argued against escaped markup in several forums: time to
stop for a while. Either I've made my points or I haven't, repeating
myself won't help. But since a number of people have suggested that
I'm not proposing any solutions: here are some solutions. And a
challenge; or at least an exercise that I think might be
interesting.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Escaped Markup: Still Harmful</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/16/escmarkup"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/16/escmarkup</id><published>2003-09-16T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:50:59.728127Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
No one has produced a single argument that even begins to
persuade me to accept escaped markup.

</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Static in the Echo</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/26/echostatic"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/26/echostatic</id><published>2003-06-26T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:48:50.481332Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
I've been following the Echo Project as best I can.
Conceptually, it seems like a good idea: the current state
of affairs with respect to RSS is pretty messy and this effort would
give us a fresh start. I've already voiced support for the idea.
But I'm really startled to see how complex things have gotten.

</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>A Slice of RSS</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/25/slice"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/25/slice</id><published>2003-06-25T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:48:43.634624Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>TheWeb</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
Standardization is a good thing. Most of my day job wouldn't
make a lot of sense if I didn't believe that. We've reached a point
where it should be possible to achieve consensus about what's required
to identify an item and what sorts of extensions should be easily
achievable. I'll support whatever the community adopts.

</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Is This a Blog?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/17/isablog"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/17/isablog</id><published>2003-06-17T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:48:27.769168Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>TheWeb</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
Sam Ruby started a discussion about the essential characteristics
of a web log entry. Herewith a few thoughts of my own.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>RSS and RDF</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/22/rssrdf"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/22/rssrdf</id><published>2003-05-22T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:47:29.508451Z</updated><dc:subject>RDF</dc:subject><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
On RSS, RDF, and making the former an instance of the latter.
</p></div></summary></entry><entry><title>Learning to Read</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/19/learning"/><id>http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/19/learning</id><published>2003-05-19T12:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-10-08T17:47:18.853803Z</updated><dc:subject>RSS</dc:subject><dc:subject>SelfReference</dc:subject><summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then the trick is figuring
out who to flatter, right?
</p></div></summary></entry></feed>

