The short-form week of 28 Apr–4 May 2008
05 May 2008; last modified 13 Mar 2011
The week in review, 140 characters at a time. This week, 62 messages in 49 conversations.
This document was created automatically from my archive of my Twitter stream. Due to limitations in the Twitter API and occasional glitches in my archiving system, it may not be 100% complete.
Monday at 06:21am
Hacking an RTM API in XSLT; will do properly in XProc ASAP.—@ndw
Monday at 08:44am
In a conversation that started on Monday at 09:48am
how can such a *small* dog snore *so loud*?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 11:07am
least favourite thing to do on the first day of my holiday: nursemaid a dumbass server
back to health.—@mattb
Monday at 11:33am
@twitterific, if you hover over the little "t" sometimes you get the user's twitter ID ... and
sometimes you don't. Why's that?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 12:00pm
brought home one of the boxes from Deb's office. Sounds like jet taking off. Bad bearings
in the power supply fan, likely?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 12:30pm
listened to @danielpunkass 'splain Cocoa Scripting to @macdevnet on Late Night Cocoa during morning jog. will try to add to fluid tonight.—@iTod
In a conversation that started on Monday at 01:16pm
LOLz. just got an email saying some company has been using my old OSS JSP tabs taglib
in production for 3 yrs! http://www.ditchnet.org/tabs/—@iTod
Monday at 01:18pm
F*ck me. I just "refactored" a variable renaming through gobs and gobs of string literals.
Then did a bunch of editing. Then noticed.—@ndw
Monday at 01:21pm
Oh crap. Every single class. Every single interface. Shoot me. Someone please, just
shoot me.—@ndw
Monday at 01:23pm
Abandon IDE. find+grep+emacs to the rescue—@ndw
Monday at 01:26pm
find grep grep cut sort uniq emacs M-x all FTW!—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 01:29pm
Oh. In the fricking comments too. Not fixing that today. So shoot me. No, nevermind,
I already *asked* for that.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 03:04pm
There's a place where you can subscribe to a twitter search, surely. It's where again?—@ndw
Monday at 03:51pm
From VC t-shirts: "I went down on sand hill road" So did I (http://is.gd/9LVV) but what does the t-shirt mean?—@ndw
Monday at 03:59pm
In NJ? Surely you jest. There's New York pizza, then there's everything else.—@ndw
Monday at 04:12pm
Reminded of Arthur Dent by Dopplr: "New York no longer existed..." :-)—@ndw
Monday at 06:18pm
thinking it's pretty clear that if Apple refreshes the iPhone product line in June,
his will to resist will fail. It's my birthday, even.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 11:38am
just commented on an blog post at o'reilly.net regarding Norm Walsh's joining Mark
Logic -- yes, he's joining us and we're happy to have him—@ramblingman
@ramblingman Whew! ;-)—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 11:55am
Leaving the Burlington Sun campus for the last time.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 02:50pm
Installing latest Carbon Emacs—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 03:41am
crumbs, can someone please buy @tommorris a hot chocolate with fluffy marshmallows and give him a great big hug?—@psd
@psd:who's this? @9600:Deerhoof! @jayfresh:Deerhoof! @philhawksworth:can everyone please STOP saying 'DEERHOOF!' #ChooChooChooChooBeepBeep—@psd
Wednesday at 07:35am
mixed WD-* release directories into my doc/ working directory on w3.org. Wishing CVS
had directory rename...—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 08:15am
3G, GPS, thinner, and cheaper. Yeah, I'm gonna want one of those too. If I can get
an affordable plan. I ain't forking over $100/mo—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 03:24pm
So back to the "FTW" discussion. More people think/thought/prefer to think that it
means Fuck the World, not For teh Win. Surprised? Not I.—@mollydotcom
@mollydotcom I must live an isolated existence, I've never even heard the vulgar version of FTW.
It doesn't even make sense to me. WTF? :-)—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 03:29pm
Can't believe I just heard Justice Scalia saying torture is not "cruel and unusual
punishment" because it is interrogation, not punishment.—@webmink
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 05:05pm
Not a fan of using travel agencies. Usually just easier to book it myself rather than
go back and forth on optimal flights.—@cote
Wednesday at 08:10pm
Thanks!—@ndw
Thursday at 08:39am
printing a new calendar for the fridge; I quite like having my own, really.—@ndw
Thursday at 09:29am
Deb's desk comes home from her office. I get her desk. My desk goes in the basement.
My office looks like a bomb went off. More than usual.—@ndw
Thursday at 09:33am
More annoying than telemarketers: telemarketers who hang up when you answer the phone,
but keep calling back every damn day.—@ndw
Thursday at 11:06am
Where the heck is Adium getting the status "in Belchertown" from?—@ndw
Thursday at 08:49pm
I don't actually mind what Adium is doing, I just want to know when I enabled it.
Not FireEagle, surely?—@ndw
Thursday at 09:02pm
"Please, for the love of Korn, do not watch this unless you are prepared to see things
you can never unsee. " Heh. And yeah, unsee plz!—@ndw
Friday at 07:00am
disassembling my desk.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 08:11am
Friday at 09:11pm
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:23am
got the multiple dispatch example in parrot perl6 working—@cutlass
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 11:24am
Well, JAVA falling to $12.64 certainly answers the question, "what do I do about my
stock options"?—@ndw
Saturday at 12:32pm
Weekly backups. I really need to register my copy of SuperDuper!—@ndw
Saturday at 03:09pm
Anyone know anything about the "V7" brand of LCD displays?—@ndw
Saturday at 06:37pm
Bah. MS/Y! merger looks to be going through?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 01:41am
Just received a couple of pretty rare Mascagni photos I bought on eBay. But I don't
have a good scanner around.—@ebruchez
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 03:59pm
It dawns on me that when we defined Atom, we didn't define fragment semantics. So
http://wherever/foo.atom#42 doesn't mean anything.—@timbray
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 04:37pm
xml:id is teh suck. Since every Atom entry in a feed is guaranteed to have a unique
ID, this should not be rocket science.—@timbray
Sunday at 04:54pm
Language designers get to define the semantics they want with a mime type. Application/xml
uses xml:id. You don't have to use it.—@ndw
Sunday at 04:55pm
But you should :-)—@ndw
Sunday at 04:55pm
Actually, application/xml semantics remain in perpetual limbo, but that's a different
problem—@ndw
Sunday at 05:01pm
Except that it's helpful because it gives you an interoperable, default fragid semantics.—@ndw