The short-form week of 20–26 Sep 2010
27 Sep 2010; last modified 13 Mar 2011
The week in review, 140 characters at a time. This week, 33 messages in 30 conversations. (With 3 favorites.)
This document was created automatically from my archive of my Twitter stream. Due to limitations in the Twitter API and occasional glitches in my archiving system, it may not be 100% complete.
In a conversation that started on Monday at 03:03am
Dawkins, in full-on attack mode, doesn't let little things like Godwin's Law get in
his way. Ouf. http://is.gd/fj79e—@timbray
Monday at 11:42am
In a conversation that started on Monday at 01:46pm
Matt on the new 2factor authent: http://is.gd/fjUQd I use a little plastic fob because I'm always reflashing my phones. Important!—@timbray
Monday at 02:14pm
Booking more international travel (W3C Tech Plen), insert usual rant about calendars
and timezones here.—@ndw
Monday at 04:02pm
jQuery plugins for Google Maps and Google Charts are definitely going to make my life
easier. Sweetness!—@ndw
Monday at 04:09pm
There's really only one thing to say to rich Americans who bitch about ruinous tax
cuts expiring: STFU. Seriously, just STFU.—@kendall
Monday at 05:37pm
Sure, @shepline @hildjj. I found http://bit.ly/cD0sPe and http://bit.ly/aX9QvMM. jMapping looks good for my app. Haven't dug into charts yet.—@ndw
Tuesday at 06:32am
I thought github being down would be a trending topic. Not that I can tell from twitter.com
this morning. http://yfrog.com/7d80421182j—@ndw
Tuesday at 12:40pm
The English language version of the putatively official web site for LYS is identified
as a "Reported Attack Page!"—@ndw
Tuesday at 02:05pm
Claiming God told you so doesn't mean I'm not going to tell you when you're stupid.
It's not religious persecution. You're just stupid.—@kplawver
Tuesday at 03:03pm
Digging through a maze of twisty Makefiles, all inscrutible.—@ndw
Wednesday at 08:17am
Arrgh! I let another dev build expire. Good thing I can set the clocks back on these
boxes.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 11:32am
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 12:31pm
Wednesday at 07:01pm
Chez Albert. Lamb dinner. 'nough said. Mmmmm Mmmmm.—@ndw
Thursday at 07:19am
Updated xprocbook.com; no diffs (yet) but mostly Chapter 3, I think.—@ndw
Thursday at 09:54am
Got my Twitter backups working again with http://github.com/ndw/XQuery-OAuthh. Should blog that library, I suppose. Maybe document it first.—@ndw
Thursday at 11:12am
RT @ndw: Updated xprocbook.com; no diffs (yet) but mostly Chapter 3, I think.—@vojtechtoman
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 03:49pm
Note to self: when recording a screencast, turn off your phone. Grrr.—@ndw
Friday at 12:39am
"Install 2,3 repeat, spank, vomit blows". This really is the best email ever http://tinyurl.com/2vggznk—@abdelazer
Friday at 05:52am
Why GNU grep is fast: "The key to making programs fast is to make them do practically
nothing." http://bit.ly/9UtWXX—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 08:41am
A simple law to predict developer agility: http://tinyurl.com/mccreary-law—@dmccreary
In a conversation that started on Friday at 09:44am
Need a word for the time you spend waiting to figure out if a process is hanging because
you broke it rather than just taking a long time.—@liza
@liza limbo. Or purgatory. Depending on one's mood.—@JeanKaplansky
Friday at 06:01pm
In a conversation that started on Saturday at 03:11pm
I have joined the HTML Working Group. May the fates have mercy on my soul.—@ndw
@ndw I will bet good money you will have a lot more success then you think, make sure
you call on your xml brethren to shout when needed—@xquery
@JeniT Madness, I'm sure. I sincerely want HTML5 to play nice with XML. I can't rail against
the result if I don't attempt to help.—@ndw
@ndw: the WG's mission statement, "lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate", didn't give
you a clue?—@david_megginson
@david_megginson Luckily my dad prepared me by instructing me "illegitimi non carborundum"—@ndw
@ndw: "Some people called the 'Romanes', they go 'house'??" Pls correct the grammar,
then write it 100 times on the Harvard library.—@david_megginson
@ndw Had to look that up, and Google led me here: http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Illegitimi_non_carborundum—@JeniT
@ndw you'll need every bit of patience you have, but you can achieve something. Good luck!—@laurendw
@ndw Good luck! I think they are beyond help in many ways, but it is noble of you to try.—@james_clark
@james_clark would be really great if you could share your views on what is wrong with "HTML5".
Cheers!—@annevk
@annevk My biggest complaint would be the process: excessive deference to major browser vendors,
plus the dual WHATWG/W3C specs cc @ndw—@james_clark
@james_clark presumably not liking the process has something to do with the result of it? Can
I persuade you to write a blog post?—@annevk
@annevk It's not about the result: I haven't studied the result closely enough (yet) to form
a view about the result.—@james_clark
@ndw re: HTML5. admirable. Let me know if there are ways I (we) can help. Wish I had
the time for similar endeavor.—@aspyker
@ndw Great, HTML WG really needs some new blood to defend reasonable positions.—@jirkakosek
Saturday at 03:26pm
Saturday at 03:30pm
Saturday at 11:01pm
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 07:21am
Pulled four casual, brown shoes out of my closet randomly. Did not make a single pair.
ETOOMANYSHOES—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 12:21pm
Is the DoD going to burn my Kindle as well? http://bit.ly/dtT3Pl—@ashooner