The short-form week of 23–29 Apr 2012
30 Apr 2012
The week in review, 140 characters at a time.
This document was created automatically from my archive of my Twitter stream. Due to limitations in the Twitter API and occasional glitches in my archiving system, it may not be 100% complete.
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 09:01am
hoping that @ndw's post on text/plain document fragments with RFC 5147 and #XIncludehttp://t.co/5TKFvJQo will get the latter fixed asap.—@dret
In a conversation that started on Monday at 02:24am
The eternal duel twixt knight and dragon http://t.co/kTC8D3fz—@JeniT
In a conversation that started on Monday at 03:13am
In a conversation that started on Monday at 05:14am
Essentials: 6 Command Line Tools for Linux Performance Monitoring http://t.co/DtQVpXsb—@mikeloukides
RT @mikeloukides Essentials: 6 Command Line Tools for Linux Performance Monitoring http://t.co/4yQxmNZu—@ndw
Monday at 06:38am
What ultimately doomed the Neanderthals was their lack of a social media strategy.—@harrisj
In a conversation that started on Monday at 09:40am
I wonder if I don’t have the new #GMail interface yet, or if it just doesn’t bother me. Not that I care much, I read email
in #Emacs.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 10:00am
OK I have had it up to >>here<< with ajaxy UIs that look like they've saved state
then lose everything silently.—@j4
Monday at 10:10am
Oh, frak! /etc/fstab has two mounts on /drives/sdb1 and nothing for /dev/sda1 and
... oh frak frak frak WTF?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 10:36am
Probably time to switch back to a stand-up desk... http://t.co/d1aa1dFa—@mdubinko
In a conversation that started on Monday at 11:22am
Winter is coming http://t.co/raxZpc6c—@ndw
Monday at 11:31am
Coming to believe that adulthood is the state of being perpetually convinced you are
about to massively screw up and be revealed as a fraud.—@JKeverne
In a conversation that started on Monday at 12:22pm
XMLUnit: based on JUnit, enables assertions to be made about content and structure
of XML #cmsconference—@edwinalui
Monday at 12:44pm
Stop, drop, and roll. http://t.co/FMbNBgrS—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Monday at 01:26pm
The shear number of gorgeous young men and women who add me to their Google+ circles
everyday is so good for my ego. I must be awesome.—@ndw
Monday at 04:48pm
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand wrong answers."—@counternotions
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 08:29am
my new wheels. LLAP http://t.co/sgnVMDoN—@TheRealNimoy
.@TheRealNimoy That’s pretty good.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 10:03am
Wonder what the significance of the zipper is on Google today. Must be missing something
important!—@harveybetty
@harveybetty Pull down the zipper and all will be revealed.—@ndw
Tuesday at 10:28am
@ndw very cute!!!—@harveybetty
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 10:52am
Expecting big space law wars if Planetary Resources really start acting. Surely this
whole project must sound truly scary to some.—@vojtechtoman
@vojtechtoman That was my first thought as well. War in space over astroid resources.—@ndw
@ndw Also the thought of a single megacorp having control over all… But I think others
wanting to follow is the only possible way.—@vojtechtoman
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 11:20am
Given the unstable mess that Cyanogen7 made out of my T2, I suppose I might get the
One S, though part of me thinks I’d prefer the Nexus.—@ndw
@ndw which is available on play store now. Think I'm still going with one s tomorrow.—@kingargyle
@ndw just have to have it in Cyanogen? It worked oK on my Nook Color, but haven't had
the guts to mess with it since...—@JeanKaplansky
@JeanKaplansky I did it on a whim, mostly. I wanted to see what it would be like. If it didn’t crash
10 times a day, I’d be very happy w/it.—@ndw
@ndw totally get the whim. I wanted to see the big deal, too. The NC Archie's Angry Birds
unit now, so crashes aren't as bad as if phone!—@JeanKaplansky
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 12:47pm
Hilarious NSFW preso about mobile software development: http://t.co/910iveo8—@timbray
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 02:49pm
So, are you moving off Google yet? http://t.co/DNmcFYu7 - keep in mind your Google Docs seem to be part of Drive now.—@bphogan
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 05:06pm
"W3C is publishing HTML 5 through a disciplined process."
http://t.co/0FZLVWGS—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers That wasn’t supposed to make me blow wine out my nose, was it?—@ndw
@ndw Well, I was aiming for coffee...but wine will do...—@shelleypowers
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 05:54pm
Tuesday at 06:05pm
+100 points for me for discovering that the license key server is offline *before*
installing a new version of the server!—@ndw
Tuesday at 06:37pm
Oh, c’mon, interwebs! I had one free evening to get this backup/reinstall project
finished and you choose *tonight* to break? Really? Fsck!—@ndw
Tuesday at 07:02pm
And now simple build files aren’t working. Ok, computer, you win. I’m going to go
watch TV instead. Fsck you.—@ndw
Wednesday at 01:56am
Excellent, excellent deck on polyfills - spot on from creator of @css3pie: http://t.co/xoCizyhu /via @Modernizr & @lojjic—@rem
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 04:39am
I'd love to see a woman or group of women edit the #HTML5 spec. It'd make for a n interesting social experiment. Certainly would be a first.—@mollydotcom
@mollydotcom Not sure why, but I'm getting flack for retweeting this. Is it so painful for people
to contemplate women in editorial pos?—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers I honestly don't know how to answer that. Somehow I just walk in to boy's rooms without
much kerfuffle. I don't know why.—@mollydotcom
@mollydotcom @shellypowers why? As in, what would you expect/ hope to be different if editor has boobs rather
than bollocks?—@brucel
@brucel @mollydotcom @shellypowers Also, it would be a nice for women to be something other than handmaidens at the
W3C—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers oh bullshit sweeping generalisations. @shawn_slh et al, are you the handmaidens of the W3C? @brucel—@patrick_h_lauke
@patrick_h_lauke @shelleypowers @brucel no. and this is not something I can effectively address through twitter. happy to
talk by phone.—@shawn_slh
@shawn_slh @patrick_h_lauke @brucel Yes, please do have your private discussions on the topic. I have other things to
do, myself.—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers @mollydotcom It *would* be nice. But the most important is the work an editor produces, surely,
not where their lumps are?—@brucel
@shelleypowers is "ensuring different perspectives are captured" an exclusively female trait? @mollydotcom—@brucel
@brucel @mollydotcom Let's say that women are more keenly aware of what it means to be excluded. Especially
in technology.—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers @brucel No way. I already have my hands full, thanks muchly! Picking my battles is a defense
mechanism I need at this time.—@mollydotcom
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 04:51am
The real question: Is there anyone who actually *wants* to edit the #w3C #HTML5 spec? My personal instinct is flight, and I normally fight.—@mollydotcom
@mollydotcom In that political environment? You’d have to be stark raving...—@ndw
Wednesday at 05:50am
Note to my future self: when connectivity to the mothership breaks down, if you’ve
used VPN that day, just reboot.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 07:23am
This morning, the packaging feature in MarkLogic 5 saved me about a zillion hours.
#productivity #ftw #tootyourownhorn—@ndw
Wednesday at 07:50am
Service will return after about 1E6 documents load. I really need to tweak mlsrestore
so that it works in batches.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 07:57am
I think the MarkLogic peeps need a native RDF database. They just don't know it yet.
:>—@kendall
@peteaven Heard of it, but that's the first details I've seen. Pretty toy-like compared to
real RDF databases, or so it seems.—@kendall
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 08:28am
@avernet I didn’t know about glyphicons. They look nice too. But having them in a font makes
using Fico icons extra easy.—@ndw
@ndw True. If you prefer a font, you might also want to check out Font Awesome http://t.co/fSxRGrFa and the Iconic set http://t.co/K3J5mIjc—@avernet
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 08:53am
.@mcepl Yes, http://t.co/O6rpCtEww, et. al. are down as I warned. Restore going smoothly in the background. Expect
normal service soon(ish)—@ndw
Wednesday at 10:02am
Wednesday at 10:07am
Exactly & absolutely. RT @kendall What's wrong with American culture in one infographic: http://t.co/jj1qmvXy—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 10:14am
The RDFa triples you get from a putatively “HTML” document are significantly different
if it’s serialized as HTML or XHTML? Really? Srsly?—@ndw
@ndw @hsivonen not true. HTML and XHTML produce the same thing, if treated as HTML5. It's XHTML1
which differs, due to compatibility. #rdfa—@Gkellogg
@Gkellogg @ndw @hsivonen I fail to see that as specified. application/xhtml+xml is specifically referenced
by XHTML+RDFa and not HTML+RDFa—@alexmilowski
@alexmilowski @ndw @hsivonen From the HTML+RDFa spec (http://t.co/KbHyrJAv)), "defines rules and guidelines ... for use in HTML5 and XHTML5"—@Gkellogg
@alexmilowski @ndw @hsivonen You're right that it doesn't specify application/xhtml+html by name, though. It should.—@Gkellogg
@Gkellogg @ndw @hsivonen That's not a rule--a reference to a unofficial name. When you receive content-type
application/xhtml+xml ?—@alexmilowski
@ndw re: RDFa triples diff from XHTML/HTML - Only for rel-keywords ... because the rel
keywords allowed in XHTML and HTML5 are different.—@manusporny
@manusporny @ndw Except in HTML5, XHTML is a serialization so now @rel values are the same? XHTML1 isn't even referenced by HTML5. #rdfa—@alexmilowski
@ndw or rather, the meaning of a number of rel-keywords changed between XHTML and HTML5.—@manusporny
@manusporny Given that users can’t easily tell and don’t generally care about the serialization,
I’m not sure I think that’s the right ans.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 11:27am
OK, that's the third kernel panic in the last week or so. Is this Apple's way of
forcing me to upgrade to Lion?—@ronhitchens
@ronhitchens You think there will be fewer with Lion, do you?—@ndw
@ndw Does that really matter, if it's Apple trying to make me upgrade? Ironically, I've
already bought Lion but haven't upgraded yet.—@ronhitchens
Wednesday at 11:57am
Why rel-value triples are different for XHTML+RDFa vs. HTML5+RDFa: http://t.co/x35p5R75 /cc @ndw @hsivonen @fakebaldur @simonstl #rdfa...—@manusporny
Wednesday at 12:14pm
All systems back to normal. AFAIK. http://t.co/xYZ9Rodp—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 02:21pm
If Google Drive terms of use don't change, we'll have to leave Google Apps completely
since Google Drive will be Docs storage eventually.—@kendall
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 02:48pm
To be more clear (but less interesting): You can't reliably determine if a software
system is "beta" from the version identifier.—@kendall
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 02:53pm
Am I the only one who always inserts an extra closing paren if I end a parenthetical
expression with a smiley: (like this :-) )?—@ndw
@ndw I add a ) too—@olivierjeulin
@ndw It's because you're a coder, Norm. Matching parens is hardwired into your brain (unless
you do Python, of course).—@david_megginson
@ndw Yes you are. If I use a smiley, I change the parenthesis to square brackets: [like
this :-) ]—@donohoe_paul
@ndw nope I do that too!!—@hungarianhc
@ndw Not just you, though, having a double chin makes the :-)) seem somewhat less syntactically
schoolmarmish. :-)—@kiphampton
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 05:20pm
@Gkellogg @ndw @hsivonen ...very confusing to have two "profiles" of RDFa applicable to a single media type.
Solution: Ignore XHTML+RDFa !?—@alexmilowski
@alexmilowski @ndw @hsivonen XHTML+RDFa is historic. What's even worse is that text/html matches both microdata,
RDFa and turtle-in-html.—@Gkellogg
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 07:21pm
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 07:57am
biking + gps + maps = art http://t.co/vlRNvsPW—@peteaven
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 11:55am
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 12:35pm
If I were buying my own phone, it would so be a Galaxy Note.—@elharo
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 02:32pm
Why exactly am I inside and working today? Why?—@collwhit
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 02:56pm
Writing XSLT to combine modular XSLT into single file is interesting. Sorry purists
-- had to use 'disable-output-escaping="yes"'.—@harveybetty
@harveybetty If none of the stylesheets use DOE, why did you have to? And how are you dealing
with import precedence?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 03:23pm
*holds up paper cutout the size of the Galaxy Note* That is one big *ss phone.—@ndw
@ndw did you get the HTC One S yet? I bought my yesterday, I'm liking the phone.—@kingargyle
@kingargyle No. I’m on the fence about what to get next.—@ndw
@ndw the only thing that it is taking getting used to is the screen size at 4.3 inches,
I have small hands. Plus it is razor thin.—@kingargyle
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 03:42pm
@ndw Documentum can't use modular XSLT files. It requires (or at least that is what I
am told) a single XSLT.—@harveybetty
@harveybetty Ok, but if you’re combining xsl:import’d stylesheets into a single file, I fear you’re
headed for a world of pain.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 03:51pm
@ndw - it's done and is working well! Converted 20 files to PDF successfully. Only
weird problem is exclude-result-prefixes doesn't work.—@harveybetty
@harveybetty I couldn’t begin to guess why :-)—@ndw
Thursday at 05:40pm
Dear Time Machine, thanks for actually, you know, working this time (tried it again
on a whim) but “Indexing backup...” takes how long?—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 12:09am
Answering a FAQ: I use an Android, but Evil Wil Wheaton uses an iPhone on #BigBangTheory. We're different people, and I have superior tech.—@wilw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 04:17am
Should I press that "12.04" button?—@AndySeaborne
@AndySeaborne I’ll let you know after the estimated “1 day 10 hours” remaining in this upgrade.
(It stalled overnight asking a question)—@ndw
@ndw As long as that isn't counter wrap.—@AndySeaborne
@AndySeaborne Ha. I don’t think so. It’s rounded back down to 15 hours in the few minutes since
I sent that tweet.—@ndw
Friday at 05:50am
Damn bears. I thought we’d made it this spring. Fences mended. Bird feeders taken
down. Poor birds. :-(—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 06:08am
I’m sad to say JAXP deserves the callout it gets on slide 28. RT @mdubinko How to design a good API and why it matters http://t.co/6X0YkTIn—@ndw
Friday at 06:24am
RT @ndw: Sad: JAXP deserves the callout it gets on slide 28. RT @mdubinko How to design a good API and why it matters http://t.co/6ALuEIDz—@atmanes
In a conversation that started on Friday at 08:16am
I use this sometimes to resize my mail window. http://t.co/wjhmx3FV Yes my mail reader is set to "text only"—@karlpro
In a conversation that started on Friday at 08:23am
My mom needs to get off my facebook. The second I get to college she's blocked—@FrancescaHoule
@FrancescaHoule You’re just hoping she doesn’t find your twitter :-)—@ndw
@ndw she wouldn't be able to understand it—@FrancescaHoule
Friday at 08:44am
"@FactsOfSchool: Mom: "Let me see your Twitter." Me: *Throws computer out the window* "What Twitter?""
@ndw—@FrancescaHoule
In a conversation that started on Friday at 09:08am
Readability for the Kindle Fire updated! Send to Readability via share from the browser
+ improved syncing. Grab it! http://t.co/jQCShvaN—@readability
In a conversation that started on Friday at 11:20am
Friday at 11:21am
LOL. http://t.co/JWNNxIin is very, very funny.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 11:24am
In a conversation that started on Friday at 01:07pm
In a conversation that started on Friday at 01:15pm
Note to self: You’re in a grumpy mood, norm. Do not rise to the bait of trolls, even
accidental and possibly well meaning ones.—@ndw
Friday at 01:45pm
“π to 39 digits could make a circle the size of the observable universe accurate to
the size of a hydrogen atom.” http://t.co/UIXWqIm7—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Friday at 02:09pm
So CISPA effectively shreds the 4th Amendment for online activities. Is that right?!—@kendall
In a conversation that started on Friday at 03:39pm
I swear my SVG to PNG converter worked better last time I used it. What now?—@ndw
@ndw If you don't mind Java, http://t.co/CFFTKw5FF. Or Björn's http://t.co/wPpPhlkk is good too.—@heycam
@ndw pixel pixies—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers Pointer? I’m afraid a web search for “pixel pixies” wasn’t very illuminating.—@ndw
@ndw I was responding to your mentioning of graphics software not working well. It's pixel
pixies.—@shelleypowers
@shelleypowers Ah. FWIW, @heycam’s suggestion of http://t.co/wsLhiS8N seems like it might be the thing.—@ndw
Friday at 04:06pm
Hmm. git svn rebase on my copy of the server on the Friday afternoon before the user
conference. What could possibly go wrong?—@ndw
Saturday at 03:28pm
Current status: enjoying a Mazatlan http://t.co/cIbCxvSR—@ndw