The short-form week of 4–10 May 2015
11 May 2015; last modified 16 Jun 2015
The week in review, 140 characters at a time.
This document was created automatically from my archive of my Twitter stream. Due to limitations in the Twitter API and occasional glitches in my archiving system, it may not be 100% complete.
In a conversation that started on Monday at 08:47am
Is 'pydoc' state of the art for Python API docs? 'pydoc -w directory' complains "no doc found" where 'pydoc -w directory/file.py' works.—@ndw
Monday at 01:00pm
Tuesday at 05:06pm
This is our "free press". The playthings of panicking rich moguls spreading fear to stop any threat to their power http://t.co/xvwtfXpHJB
—@OwenJones84
Tuesday at 11:41pm
"And now this once-in-a-lifetime event is happening again..." Uhm...—@ndw
Wednesday at 11:47pm
Wednesday at 11:55pm
RT @SciencePorn: Lost an electron. You really have to keep an ion them.—@ndw
Thursday at 12:02am
In a conversation that started on Thursday at 09:08pm
Thursday at 11:21pm
RT @codinghorror: I try to cheer people up by reminding them it could be worse, they could also be dead on the outside. That is why I am a …—@ndw
Friday at 12:14am
Turn the UK off and turn it back on again.—@brianftang
Saturday at 03:45am
Password must contain a capital letter, a number, a plot, a protagonist with some character development, and a surprise ending.—@moonbeamattach
Saturday at 06:38am
What Your Computer Does While You Wait http://t.co/WZ89ezsyRK
—@iand
Sunday at 12:00am
Sunday at 09:18am
RT @Jaqian: The simple math problem that blows apart the NSA's surveillance justifications http://t.co/0MnwX4UMl3 @doctorow
—@ndw
Sunday at 03:58pm
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords seems increasingly appealing as a basis for a system of government.—@Longshanks1307
Sunday at 11:19pm
“Every society honors its live conformists and its dead troublemakers.” —Marshall McLuhan—@mattthomas
Sunday at 11:38pm
RT @Kurt_Vonnegut: They say there are no atheists in foxholes, and this is a good argument against atheism. I think it's a better argument …—@ndw