The short-form week of 10–16 Aug 2015
17 Aug 2015; last modified 03 Oct 2015
The week in review, 140 characters at a time.
This document was created automatically from my archive of my Twitter stream. Due to limitations in the Twitter API and occasional glitches in my archiving system, it may not be 100% complete.
Monday at 09:27pm
Tuesday at 08:59am
In a conversation that started on Tuesday at 09:59am
"The tree is a premature optimization." attributed anonymously to the overlapping
markup liberation front. #balisage—@ndw
@ndw @pgfearo
#browsers can deal with #overlapping #markup #non #xml
https://t.co/CmLFdFGDZv
(➫ "circle graphs") http://t.co/qR86z6MVEt—@HermannSW
@HermannSW @ndw browser rendering engines still use a visual tree, also - how to show intersect of
2 overlapping elements of same type?—@pgfearo
@HermannSW @ndw Our HTML5 comparator must show where overlaps happen - one way is quickly switching
views: http://t.co/7IySJNp0uO—@pgfearo
@pgfearo @ndw
Perhaps just with the blue over and underlines leaving normal markup unchanged? http://t.co/k7DYRKCshS—@HermannSW
@HermannSW @ndw A way to show deeply nested markup overlaps is a text dump of the concurrent parser
stacks: http://t.co/mfRgFQH9YL—@pgfearo
Tuesday at 10:41am
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 11:16am
@ndw @sgmlguru Could you post a summary of the issues to exist-open? It would be good to begin to
identify what work needs to be done.—@joewiz
@sgmlguru @ndw @lcahlander Please do, Ari. I wasn’t aware of problems w/ #existdb’s XProc until your talk. Would be nice to work these out.—@joewiz
@ndw @joewiz @sgmlguru dependencies of Saxon versions. Calabash requires 9.5 and eXist requires 9.4 due
to betterFORM.—@lcahlander
@ndw As far as I know no one has for sometime. History https://t.co/0hyhJv41xu seems to
be @shabanovd and @windauer. Feel free to contribute—@adamretter
@adamretter @ndw @shabanovd @windauer Didn't @lcahlander contribute as well? I know he mentioned it.—@sgmlguru
@sgmlguru @adamretter @ndw @shabanovd @windauer I looked into it, but have not had the time recently.—@lcahlander
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 11:22am
Wednesday at 03:08pm
Engineers at play: the NEIM "suspicious activity report" documentation uses as an
example an attack on Mr Burns' power plant in Springfield.—@ndw
Wednesday at 04:33pm
Wednesday at 06:14pm
Wednesday at 06:17pm
Rosé Sangiovese, Barnard Griffen, 2012 I think.—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Wednesday at 09:07pm
Thursday at 05:07am
Everyone thinks Clinton used her personal email to avoid scrutiny. She probably just
didn't want to use Outlook Web Access.—@tommorris
Thursday at 09:33am
Thursday at 11:07am
Thursday at 12:57pm
pondering "JSON in the streets but XML in the sheets" as a possible personal summary
for myself at future meet-ups,cons, events, etc.—@peteaven
Thursday at 04:53pm
Thursday at 08:04pm
Thursday at 09:51pm
Thursday at 09:52pm
Friday at 06:18pm
This is becoming a ritual.
1. Download App
2. Start App
3. App asks to login with FaceBook
4. Delete App—@qdolan
Saturday at 10:55am
RT @mathiasverraes: There are only two hard problems in distributed systems: 2. Exactly-once delivery
1. Guaranteed order of messages 2. E…—@ndw
Saturday at 11:02am
RT @philipcolligan: Powerful stuff from Martin Rees in Times. "Our perspectives should be global, and
stretch at least a century ahead" htt…—@ndw
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 12:20pm
@ndw concerning http://t.co/nK31cCVauC ... isn't the answer MD/AsciiDoc/something compiled to HTML/DB? Does anybody still
write DB by hand?—@mcepl
In a conversation that started on Sunday at 05:57pm
Italian tweeps, who the hell won the Palio? And why isn't on the damned web yet?—@ndw
Monday at 02:00pm
RT @dogsdoingthings: Dogs advising you to keep calm and allow the infinite weight of capitalism to grind
your bones into dust.—@ndw